TY - JOUR
T1 - Work Experiences of the Interdisciplinary Dialysis Workforce in the United States
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Survey
AU - Plantinga, Laura C.
AU - Bender, Alexis A.
AU - Urbanski, Megan
AU - Hoge, Courtney
AU - Joseph, Jessica
AU - Damron, Kelli Collins
AU - Douglas-Ajayi, Clarica J.
AU - Rickenbach, Fran
AU - Morgan, Jennifer Craft
AU - Jaar, Bernard G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 S. Karger AG. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Suboptimal dialysis care may be in part due to staff issues such as job dissatisfaction, burnout, work overload, high staff turnover, and inconsistent training. Here, we leveraged data collected in a recent national survey to provide an initial, comprehensive description of current work experiences of US dialysis care providers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,240 active US dialysis clinic staff members (physicians, advanced practice providers, nurse managers/clinic coordinators, nurses, social workers, dietitians, and patient care technicians), who were recruited via emails to society membership lists. Respondents were asked about a wide variety of work experiences, including job satisfaction, professional fulfillment, and burnout (Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index), work culture, experiences of hostility and violence, and self-reported medical errors. Responses were summarized overall and compared by clinic role. Results: Most of the survey respondents, representing all 50 US states, were aged 35-49 years (58.3%) or ≥50 years (23.5%), female (60.7%), and white (59.8%; 23.1% black, and 10.0% Asian); 82.1% had been in their current role for at least 1 year. Most US dialysis staff responding to our survey reported being generally satisfied with their jobs (mean rating of 7.9 on 0-10 scale), but only 54.4% met criteria for professional fulfillment, and 32.8% met criteria for burnout, driven by high scores in the work exhaustion domain. Related issues, including high workloads, lack of respect (including experiences of violence and hostility), lack of autonomy, and suboptimal patient environments (in terms of both safety and patient centeredness), were commonly reported among dialysis care providers, although their prevalence often differed by provider type. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the dialysis workforce may be at a critical point. Preventing further staff burnout, which could lead to even greater staffing shortages and worse working conditions among those who continue to provide dialysis care, is essential.
AB - Introduction: Suboptimal dialysis care may be in part due to staff issues such as job dissatisfaction, burnout, work overload, high staff turnover, and inconsistent training. Here, we leveraged data collected in a recent national survey to provide an initial, comprehensive description of current work experiences of US dialysis care providers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,240 active US dialysis clinic staff members (physicians, advanced practice providers, nurse managers/clinic coordinators, nurses, social workers, dietitians, and patient care technicians), who were recruited via emails to society membership lists. Respondents were asked about a wide variety of work experiences, including job satisfaction, professional fulfillment, and burnout (Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index), work culture, experiences of hostility and violence, and self-reported medical errors. Responses were summarized overall and compared by clinic role. Results: Most of the survey respondents, representing all 50 US states, were aged 35-49 years (58.3%) or ≥50 years (23.5%), female (60.7%), and white (59.8%; 23.1% black, and 10.0% Asian); 82.1% had been in their current role for at least 1 year. Most US dialysis staff responding to our survey reported being generally satisfied with their jobs (mean rating of 7.9 on 0-10 scale), but only 54.4% met criteria for professional fulfillment, and 32.8% met criteria for burnout, driven by high scores in the work exhaustion domain. Related issues, including high workloads, lack of respect (including experiences of violence and hostility), lack of autonomy, and suboptimal patient environments (in terms of both safety and patient centeredness), were commonly reported among dialysis care providers, although their prevalence often differed by provider type. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the dialysis workforce may be at a critical point. Preventing further staff burnout, which could lead to even greater staffing shortages and worse working conditions among those who continue to provide dialysis care, is essential.
KW - Burnout
KW - Dialysis workforce
KW - Job satisfaction
KW - Professional fulfillment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164297921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164297921&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000530553
DO - 10.1159/000530553
M3 - Article
C2 - 37031676
AN - SCOPUS:85164297921
SN - 0250-8095
VL - 54
SP - 145
EP - 155
JO - American Journal of Nephrology
JF - American Journal of Nephrology
IS - 3-4
ER -