TY - JOUR
T1 - Widespread belief that organic and additive-free tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products
T2 - Results from the 2017 US health information national trends survey
AU - Pearson, Jennifer L.
AU - Moran, Meghan
AU - Delnevo, Cristine D.
AU - Villanti, Andrea C.
AU - Lewis, M. Jane
N1 - Funding Information:
JLP, CDD, and MJL were supported by supported by NIDA and FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) (U54CA229973). MM was supported by NIDA and FDA CTP (K01DA037903). ACV was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (P20GM103644) and the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS) award U54DA036114 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/21
Y1 - 2019/6/21
N2 - Significance: US smokers of Natural American Spirit, a brand marketed as "organic" and "additive-free," are more likely than other cigarette smokers to believe that their brand might be less harmful than other brands. This article (1) describes the prevalence of belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products in the US population and (2) describes the sociodemographic characteristics of adults who believe tobacco products with these descriptors are less harmful. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of US adults. Logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of the belief that "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Results: Overall, 26.7% of US adults and 45.3% of adult smokers believe that "organic" tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Similarly, 35.2% of US adults and 47.1% of smokers believe that "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful. When examining gender, age, education, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and smoking status, only age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] ∼0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99 for both outcomes) and smoking status (current vs. never smokers, aOR ∼1.78, 95% CI 1.03, 3.07 for both outcomes) were correlates of believing that "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products. Conclusions: Belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread. Younger adults and current smokers are most likely to be misinformed by "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco product descriptors. Implications: Belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread among US adults and most prevalent among smokers. Removal of terms that incorrectly imply reduced harm may correct current and future consumers' misperceptions about the brand.
AB - Significance: US smokers of Natural American Spirit, a brand marketed as "organic" and "additive-free," are more likely than other cigarette smokers to believe that their brand might be less harmful than other brands. This article (1) describes the prevalence of belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products in the US population and (2) describes the sociodemographic characteristics of adults who believe tobacco products with these descriptors are less harmful. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of US adults. Logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of the belief that "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Results: Overall, 26.7% of US adults and 45.3% of adult smokers believe that "organic" tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Similarly, 35.2% of US adults and 47.1% of smokers believe that "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful. When examining gender, age, education, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and smoking status, only age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] ∼0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99 for both outcomes) and smoking status (current vs. never smokers, aOR ∼1.78, 95% CI 1.03, 3.07 for both outcomes) were correlates of believing that "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products. Conclusions: Belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread. Younger adults and current smokers are most likely to be misinformed by "organic" or "additive-free" tobacco product descriptors. Implications: Belief that "organic" and "additive-free" tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread among US adults and most prevalent among smokers. Removal of terms that incorrectly imply reduced harm may correct current and future consumers' misperceptions about the brand.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068544520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068544520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntz015
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntz015
M3 - Article
C2 - 30722066
AN - SCOPUS:85068544520
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 21
SP - 970
EP - 973
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 7
ER -