Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis [6]

Steven Goodman; Sander Greenland

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis [6]

Steven Goodman, Sander Greenland

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

49 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	773
Number of pages	1
Journal	PLoS Medicine
Volume	4
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168
State	Published - Apr 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

Cite this

@article{4991f007071343f198b4bef0a72b5ad3,

title = "Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis [6]",

author = "Steven Goodman and Sander Greenland",

year = "2007",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "773",

journal = "PLoS Medicine",

issn = "1549-1277",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why most published research findings are false

T2 - Problems in the analysis [6]

AU - Goodman, Steven

AU - Greenland, Sander

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247527774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247527774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168

M3 - Article

C2 - 17456002

AN - SCOPUS:34247527774

SN - 1549-1277

VL - 4

SP - 773

JO - PLoS Medicine

JF - PLoS Medicine

IS - 4

ER -

Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis [6]

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this