TY - JOUR
T1 - Whole-cerebrum guanidino and amide CEST mapping at 3 T by a 3D stack-of-spirals gradient echo acquisition
AU - Wang, Kexin
AU - Ju, Licheng
AU - Song, Yulu
AU - Blair, Lindsay
AU - Xie, Kevin
AU - Liu, Claire
AU - Li, Anna M.
AU - Zhu, Dan
AU - Xu, Feng
AU - Liu, Guanshu
AU - Heo, Hye Young
AU - Yadav, Nirbhay Narayan
AU - Oeltzschner, Georg
AU - Edden, Richard A.E.
AU - Qin, Qin
AU - Kamson, David Olayinka
AU - Xu, Jiadi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: To develop a 3D, high-sensitivity CEST mapping technique based on the 3D stack-of-spirals (SOS) gradient echo readout, the proposed approach was compared with conventional acquisition techniques and evaluated for its efficacy in concurrently mapping of guanidino (Guan) and amide CEST in human brain at 3 T, leveraging the polynomial Lorentzian line-shape fitting (PLOF) method. Methods: Saturation time and recovery delay were optimized to achieve maximum CEST time efficiency. The 3DSOS method was compared with segmented 3D EPI (3DEPI), turbo spin echo, and gradient- and spin-echo techniques. Image quality, temporal SNR (tSNR), and test–retest reliability were assessed. Maps of Guan and amide CEST derived from 3DSOS were demonstrated on a low-grade glioma patient. Results: The optimized recovery delay/saturation time was determined to be 1.4/2 s for Guan and amide CEST. In addition to nearly doubling the slice number, the gradient echo techniques also outperformed spin echo sequences in tSNR: 3DEPI (193.8 ± 6.6), 3DSOS (173.9 ± 5.6), and GRASE (141.0 ± 2.7). 3DSOS, compared with 3DEPI, demonstrated comparable GuanCEST signal in gray matter (GM) (3DSOS: [2.14%–2.59%] vs. 3DEPI: [2.15%–2.61%]), and white matter (WM) (3DSOS: [1.49%–2.11%] vs. 3DEPI: [1.64%–2.09%]). 3DSOS also achieves significantly higher amideCEST in both GM (3DSOS: [2.29%–3.00%] vs. 3DEPI: [2.06%–2.92%]) and WM (3DSOS: [2.23%–2.66%] vs. 3DEPI: [1.95%–2.57%]). 3DSOS outperforms 3DEPI in terms of scan–rescan reliability (correlation coefficient: 3DSOS: 0.58–0.96 vs. 3DEPI: −0.02 to 0.75) and robustness to motion as well. Conclusion: The 3DSOS CEST technique shows promise for whole-cerebrum CEST imaging, offering uniform contrast and robustness against motion artifacts.
AB - Purpose: To develop a 3D, high-sensitivity CEST mapping technique based on the 3D stack-of-spirals (SOS) gradient echo readout, the proposed approach was compared with conventional acquisition techniques and evaluated for its efficacy in concurrently mapping of guanidino (Guan) and amide CEST in human brain at 3 T, leveraging the polynomial Lorentzian line-shape fitting (PLOF) method. Methods: Saturation time and recovery delay were optimized to achieve maximum CEST time efficiency. The 3DSOS method was compared with segmented 3D EPI (3DEPI), turbo spin echo, and gradient- and spin-echo techniques. Image quality, temporal SNR (tSNR), and test–retest reliability were assessed. Maps of Guan and amide CEST derived from 3DSOS were demonstrated on a low-grade glioma patient. Results: The optimized recovery delay/saturation time was determined to be 1.4/2 s for Guan and amide CEST. In addition to nearly doubling the slice number, the gradient echo techniques also outperformed spin echo sequences in tSNR: 3DEPI (193.8 ± 6.6), 3DSOS (173.9 ± 5.6), and GRASE (141.0 ± 2.7). 3DSOS, compared with 3DEPI, demonstrated comparable GuanCEST signal in gray matter (GM) (3DSOS: [2.14%–2.59%] vs. 3DEPI: [2.15%–2.61%]), and white matter (WM) (3DSOS: [1.49%–2.11%] vs. 3DEPI: [1.64%–2.09%]). 3DSOS also achieves significantly higher amideCEST in both GM (3DSOS: [2.29%–3.00%] vs. 3DEPI: [2.06%–2.92%]) and WM (3DSOS: [2.23%–2.66%] vs. 3DEPI: [1.95%–2.57%]). 3DSOS outperforms 3DEPI in terms of scan–rescan reliability (correlation coefficient: 3DSOS: 0.58–0.96 vs. 3DEPI: −0.02 to 0.75) and robustness to motion as well. Conclusion: The 3DSOS CEST technique shows promise for whole-cerebrum CEST imaging, offering uniform contrast and robustness against motion artifacts.
KW - 3D stack-of-spirals GRE (3DSOS)
KW - amideCEST
KW - arginine CEST (ArgCEST)
KW - chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
KW - concentration
KW - continuous wave gradient- and spin-echo (cwGRASE)
KW - creatine CEST (CrCEST)
KW - exchange rate
KW - guanidino or guanidinium CEST (GuanCEST)
KW - high spectral resolution (HSR) CEST
KW - polynomial Lorentzian line-shape fitting (PLOF)
KW - segmented 3D EPI (3DEPI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193412252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193412252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mrm.30134
DO - 10.1002/mrm.30134
M3 - Article
C2 - 38748853
AN - SCOPUS:85193412252
SN - 0740-3194
VL - 92
SP - 1456
EP - 1470
JO - Magnetic resonance in medicine
JF - Magnetic resonance in medicine
IS - 4
ER -