Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When to Censor?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Loss to follow-up is an endemic feature of time-to-event analyses that precludes observation of the event of interest. To our knowledge, in typical cohort studies with encounters occurring at regular or irregular intervals, there is no consensus on how to handle person-time between participants' last study encounter and the point at which they meet a definition of loss to follow-up. We demonstrate, using simulation and an example, that when the event of interest is captured outside of a study encounter (e.g., in a registry), person-time should be censored when the study-defined criterion for loss to follow-up is met (e.g., 1 year after last encounter), rather than at the last study encounter. Conversely, when the event of interest must be measured within the context of a study encounter (e.g., a biomarker value), person-time should be censored at the last study encounter. An inappropriate censoring scheme has the potential to result in substantial bias that may not be easily corrected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-632
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican journal of epidemiology
Volume187
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Keywords

  • bias (epidemiology)
  • censoring
  • epidemiologic methods
  • loss to follow-up
  • selection bias
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When to Censor?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this