Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?

  • Kunal Sanghavi
  • , Betty Cohn
  • , Anya E.R. Prince
  • , W. Gregory Feero
  • , Kerry A. Ryan
  • , Kayte Spector-Bagdady
  • , Wendy R. Uhlmann
  • , Charles Lee
  • , J. Scott Roberts
  • , Debra J.H. Mathews

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Consumer interest in genetic and genomic testing is growing rapidly, with more than 26 million Americans having purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. Capitalizing on the increasing comfort of consumers with genetic testing outside the clinical environment, commercial vendors are expanding their customer base by marketing genetic and genomic testing services, including testing for pharmacogenomic and pathogenic variants, to employers for inclusion in workplace wellness programs. We describe the appeal of voluntary workplace genomic testing (wGT) to employers and employees, how the ethical, legal, and social implications literature has approached the issue of genetic testing in the workplace in the past, and outline the relevant legal landscape. Given that we are in the early stages of development of the wGT market, now is the time to identify the critical interests and concerns of employees and employers, so that governance can develop and evolve along with the wGT market, rather than behind it, and be based on data, rather than speculative hopes and fears.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5
Journalnpj Genomic Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this