TY - JOUR
T1 - Virtual reality technologies for clinical education
T2 - evaluation metrics and comparative analysis
AU - Mehrfard, Arian
AU - Fotouhi, Javad
AU - Taylor, Giacomo
AU - Forster, Tess
AU - Armand, Mehran
AU - Navab, Nassir
AU - Fuerst, Bernhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - With recent advances of Virtual Reality (VR) technology, the deployment of such will dramatically increase in non-entertainment environments, such as professional education and training, manufacturing, service, or low frequency/high-risk scenarios. Clinical education is an area that especially stands to benefit from VR technology due to the complexity, high cost, and difficult logistics. The effectiveness of the deployment of VR systems in healthcare environments is subject to factors that may not be necessarily considered for devices targeting the entertainment market. In this work, we systematically compare a wide range of VR head-mounted displays (HMDs) technologies and designs by defining a new set of metrics that are 1) relevant to medical VR solutions and 2) are of paramount importance for VR-based education and training. We evaluated 10 technologies based on various criteria, including neck strain, heat development, cleanability, and colour accuracy. Other metrics such as text readability, comfort, and contrast perception were evaluated in a multi-user study on three selected technologies, namely the ones offered by Oculus Rift S, HTC Vive Pro and Samsung Odyssey+. Results indicate that the HTC Vive Pro performs best with regards to comfort, display quality and compatibility with glasses.
AB - With recent advances of Virtual Reality (VR) technology, the deployment of such will dramatically increase in non-entertainment environments, such as professional education and training, manufacturing, service, or low frequency/high-risk scenarios. Clinical education is an area that especially stands to benefit from VR technology due to the complexity, high cost, and difficult logistics. The effectiveness of the deployment of VR systems in healthcare environments is subject to factors that may not be necessarily considered for devices targeting the entertainment market. In this work, we systematically compare a wide range of VR head-mounted displays (HMDs) technologies and designs by defining a new set of metrics that are 1) relevant to medical VR solutions and 2) are of paramount importance for VR-based education and training. We evaluated 10 technologies based on various criteria, including neck strain, heat development, cleanability, and colour accuracy. Other metrics such as text readability, comfort, and contrast perception were evaluated in a multi-user study on three selected technologies, namely the ones offered by Oculus Rift S, HTC Vive Pro and Samsung Odyssey+. Results indicate that the HTC Vive Pro performs best with regards to comfort, display quality and compatibility with glasses.
KW - Virtual reality
KW - head-mounted display
KW - medical application
KW - training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094133682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094133682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21681163.2020.1835559
DO - 10.1080/21681163.2020.1835559
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094133682
SN - 2168-1163
VL - 9
SP - 233
EP - 242
JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
IS - 3
ER -