TY - JOUR
T1 - Viability of Hand and Wrist Photogoniometry
AU - Meals, Clifton G.
AU - Saunders, Rebecca J.
AU - Desale, Sameer
AU - Means, Kenneth R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, American Association for Hand Surgery 2017.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Background: No goniometric technique is both maximally convenient and completely accurate, although photogoniometry (ie, picture taking to facilitate digital angle measurement) shows promise in this regard. Our purpose was to test the feasibility and reliability of a photogoniometric protocol designed to measure wrist and digit range of motion in general. Methods: Two independent observers examined a sample of joints in both normal and abnormal hands according to a photogoniometric protocol. Interrater and intrarater correlation were calculated, and these measurements were compared with measurements made by a third independent examiner with a manual goniometer. Results: The photo-based measurements were reliable within and between observers; however, only a minority of these measurements were in agreement with manually collected values. Conclusions: At present, photogoniometry is not an acceptable alternative to manual goniometry for determining wrist and digit range of motion in general. Joint-specific photogoniometry should be the subject of future study, as should relevant imaging and software technology.
AB - Background: No goniometric technique is both maximally convenient and completely accurate, although photogoniometry (ie, picture taking to facilitate digital angle measurement) shows promise in this regard. Our purpose was to test the feasibility and reliability of a photogoniometric protocol designed to measure wrist and digit range of motion in general. Methods: Two independent observers examined a sample of joints in both normal and abnormal hands according to a photogoniometric protocol. Interrater and intrarater correlation were calculated, and these measurements were compared with measurements made by a third independent examiner with a manual goniometer. Results: The photo-based measurements were reliable within and between observers; however, only a minority of these measurements were in agreement with manually collected values. Conclusions: At present, photogoniometry is not an acceptable alternative to manual goniometry for determining wrist and digit range of motion in general. Joint-specific photogoniometry should be the subject of future study, as should relevant imaging and software technology.
KW - digit range of motion
KW - digital angle measurement
KW - manual goniometry
KW - photogoniometry
KW - wrist range of motion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041525187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041525187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1558944717702471
DO - 10.1177/1558944717702471
M3 - Article
C2 - 28391753
AN - SCOPUS:85041525187
SN - 1558-9447
JO - Hand
JF - Hand
ER -