Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Johns Hopkins University Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Vertebroplasty augmentation procedures: Examining the controversy
Arif Hussain, Michael Erdek
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
10
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Vertebroplasty augmentation procedures: Examining the controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Randomized Controlled Trial
100%
Vertebroplasty
100%
Augmentation Techniques
100%
Vertebral Augmentation
75%
Pain Relief
50%
Placebo
25%
Number of Patients
25%
Quality of Life
25%
PubMed
25%
Patient Selection
25%
Postmenopausal Women
25%
Treatment Options
25%
Literature Search
25%
Popular
25%
Medical Community
25%
Common Themes
25%
Article number
25%
Conservative Management
25%
Lancet
25%
Metaanalysis
25%
Pain Level
25%
New England Journal of Medicine
25%
Conflicting Evidence
25%
Method Selection
25%
Common Pathology
25%
Vertebral Compression Fracture
25%
Design Selection
25%
Vertebral Disease
25%
Psychology
Quality of Life
100%
Systematic Review
100%
Conflicting Evidence
100%
Metaanalysis
100%
The Lancet
100%
Medicine and Dentistry
Randomized Controlled Trial
100%
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
100%
Analgesia
50%
Disease
25%
Meta-Analysis
25%
Quality of Life
25%
Medicine
25%
Placebo
25%
Patient Selection
25%
Postmenopause
25%
Conservative Treatment
25%
Systematic Review
25%
Compression Fracture
25%
Nursing and Health Professions
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
100%
Analgesia
66%
Disease
33%
Quality of Life
33%
Meta Analysis
33%
Systematic Review
33%
Conservative Treatment
33%
Placebo
33%
Medline
33%
Patient Selection
33%
Compression Fracture
33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
100%
Vertebral Compression Fracture
33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Systematic Review
100%