Varieties of Mistrust and American Epistemic Fragility

A. Carl LeVan, Assen Assenov, Kimberly Tower, Nicolette Carnahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Mistrust in both government and scientific authority has grown. Yet the relationship between these trends remains underappreciated, even though such mistrust shaped behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic and deserves much blame for America’s troubles with truth. Using original data from 3,000 American counties and at different points of time during the pandemic, we identify social and political conditions that increase different types of “vertical” mistrust. We use tax and Census data to proxy for political trust, and mask wearing and vaccination variables to capture trust in scientific authority. Statistical tests demonstrate a robust relationship between partisanship and both types of trust, confirming national polls and lending support to the “asymmetry hypothesis.” Tests also indicate that psychological distress and socioeconomic vulnerability contribute to mistrust, though partisanship has a powerful mediation effect. Controls reveal high levels of mistrust among evangelicals, rural residents, and some minorities while other minorities are strikingly trusting. The results hold under alternative statistical specifications. We call for more research exploring the behavioral expressions of vertical mistrust, including how it manifests collectively in communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)562-576
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • democracy
  • political trust
  • post-truth
  • public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Varieties of Mistrust and American Epistemic Fragility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this