Abstract
This article assesses the validity of ambulatory administrative and encounter data and patient self-reported information compared with information contained in the ambulatory medical record for 17 chronic diseases. Using a sample of 213 adults (18 to 64 years old) and seniors (65 years end older) enrolled in a health maintenance organization and receiving care at a multispecialty group practice in Minneapolis, Minnesota, sensitivity and specificity for claims and self-report were calculated for each chronic condition using the medical record as the criterion standard. The analysis was performed first by blinded review and then repeated with an unblinded review.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-34 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Ambulatory Care Management |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Administrative data chronic disease
- Diagnoses
- Medical records
- Quality assessment
- Self-report
- Survey
- Validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of claims diagnoses and self-reported conditions compared with medical records for selected chronic diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS