Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of claims diagnoses and self-reported conditions compared with medical records for selected chronic diseases

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This article assesses the validity of ambulatory administrative and encounter data and patient self-reported information compared with information contained in the ambulatory medical record for 17 chronic diseases. Using a sample of 213 adults (18 to 64 years old) and seniors (65 years end older) enrolled in a health maintenance organization and receiving care at a multispecialty group practice in Minneapolis, Minnesota, sensitivity and specificity for claims and self-report were calculated for each chronic condition using the medical record as the criterion standard. The analysis was performed first by blinded review and then repeated with an unblinded review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-34
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Ambulatory Care Management
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Administrative data chronic disease
  • Diagnoses
  • Medical records
  • Quality assessment
  • Self-report
  • Survey
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of claims diagnoses and self-reported conditions compared with medical records for selected chronic diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this