TY - JOUR
T1 - Vaccine Communication
T2 - Appeals and Messengers Most Effective for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Ukraine
AU - Schulz, Gretchen
AU - Balgobin, Kristian
AU - Michel, Alexandra
AU - Limaye, Rupali J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Sabin Vaccine Institute under grant number 050119-00 (Rupali J. Limaye).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine communication has been a challenge, particularly as some populations may be highly distrustful of information from public health or government institutions. To better understand the different communication needs in Ukraine, an online survey panel of 168 Ukrainian participants viewed six COVID-19 vaccination ads with three variations on vaccine messaging appeals (potential economic impacts of COVID-19 infection COVID-19 disease outcomes, and social norms related to vaccination) and two different messengers (a peer or a health provider). The ad featuring a health outcome appeal delivered by a healthcare provider was most favored (n = 53, 31.6%); however, across demographic categories, including vaccine hesitancy categories, participants expressed high levels of approval for all six variations of the COVID-19 vaccine ads. When participants ranked reasons why someone may not accept the COVID-19 vaccine, the most prevalent beliefs identified were that the vaccine was not safe, and that the vaccine was not effective. Findings from this study suggest that vaccine appeals focused on health outcomes delivered by healthcare providers are preferred by most individuals in Ukraine; however, individuals are motivated by a myriad of factors suggesting that for vaccine messaging to be most effective, communication should be varied in both appeal and messenger.
AB - Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine communication has been a challenge, particularly as some populations may be highly distrustful of information from public health or government institutions. To better understand the different communication needs in Ukraine, an online survey panel of 168 Ukrainian participants viewed six COVID-19 vaccination ads with three variations on vaccine messaging appeals (potential economic impacts of COVID-19 infection COVID-19 disease outcomes, and social norms related to vaccination) and two different messengers (a peer or a health provider). The ad featuring a health outcome appeal delivered by a healthcare provider was most favored (n = 53, 31.6%); however, across demographic categories, including vaccine hesitancy categories, participants expressed high levels of approval for all six variations of the COVID-19 vaccine ads. When participants ranked reasons why someone may not accept the COVID-19 vaccine, the most prevalent beliefs identified were that the vaccine was not safe, and that the vaccine was not effective. Findings from this study suggest that vaccine appeals focused on health outcomes delivered by healthcare providers are preferred by most individuals in Ukraine; however, individuals are motivated by a myriad of factors suggesting that for vaccine messaging to be most effective, communication should be varied in both appeal and messenger.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Ukraine
KW - message appeals
KW - vaccine communication
KW - vaccine uptake
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149148651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149148651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/vaccines11020279
DO - 10.3390/vaccines11020279
M3 - Article
C2 - 36851156
AN - SCOPUS:85149148651
SN - 2076-393X
VL - 11
JO - Vaccines
JF - Vaccines
IS - 2
M1 - 279
ER -