TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting, and Carotid Endarterectomy in the US from 2015 to 2019
AU - Stonko, David P.
AU - Goldsborough, Earl
AU - Kibrik, Pavel
AU - Zhang, George
AU - Holscher, Courtenay M.
AU - Hicks, Caitlin W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Stonko reported receiving personal fees from Catalio Capital Management LP outside the submitted work. Dr Hicks reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NIDDK), the American College of Surgeons, and the Society for Vascular Surgery; and speaker fees from Cook Medical LLC, and W.L. Gore & Associates outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9/16
Y1 - 2022/9/16
N2 - Importance: A transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) device was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for carotid revascularization in patients at high risk for stroke, cranial nerve injury, or major cardiac event. It is unclear how the introduction of TCAR has changed the use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS). Objective: To quantify the temporal changes in the operative approach to carotid revascularization (CEA vs TFCAS vs TCAR), and to identify patient and disease characteristics commonly associated with each approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from the Vascular Quality Initiative database from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR were included. Data were analyzed from January to April 2022. Exposures: Month and year of surgery as well as patient risk status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and proportion of carotid revascularization procedures by operative approach. Results: A total of 108676 patients (mean [SD] age 56.6 [12.5] years; 66 684 men [61.4%]) were included in the analysis. The most common operative approach overall was CEA (n = 81508 [75.0%]), followed by TFCAS (n = 15578 [14.3%]) and TCAR (n = 11590 [10.7%]). The number of procedures increased over the study period (16754 in 2015 vs 27269 in 2019; P <.001). In 2015, CEA was used in 84.9% of all cases, followed by TFCAS (14.4%) and TCAR (0.8%). In 2019, CEA was used in 64.8% of cases, followed by TCAR (21.9%) and TFCAS (13.3%). The proportional use of CEA decreased by 5.0% (95% CI, -7.4% to -2.6%) per year, and TCAR use increased by 5.3% (95% CI, 2.3%-8.3%) per year. Among patients at high risk, the change was greater: CEA use decreased by 7.8% (95% CI, -11.9% to -3.8%) per year, TFCAS decreased by 4.8% (95% CI, -9.5% to -0.14%) per year, and TCAR increased by 12.6% (95% CI, 7.1%-18.1%) per year. Multinomial logistic regression showed that patient risk status was the most important characteristic associated with TCAR compared with CEA (relative risk ratio, 36.10; 95% CI, 29.24-44.66; P <.001) and TFCAS (relative risk ratio, 14.10; 95% CI, 11.86-16.66; P <.001). Linear regression revealed no association between year of surgery and in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, or mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study indicate that TCAR has become the dominant carotid revascularization approach, surpassing TFCAS and CEA in patients at high risk for stroke, cranial nerve injury, or cardiovascular events. Patient high-risk status was the main characteristic associated with a stenting approach, highlighting the perceived importance of carotid stenting therapies in this patient population.
AB - Importance: A transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) device was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for carotid revascularization in patients at high risk for stroke, cranial nerve injury, or major cardiac event. It is unclear how the introduction of TCAR has changed the use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS). Objective: To quantify the temporal changes in the operative approach to carotid revascularization (CEA vs TFCAS vs TCAR), and to identify patient and disease characteristics commonly associated with each approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from the Vascular Quality Initiative database from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR were included. Data were analyzed from January to April 2022. Exposures: Month and year of surgery as well as patient risk status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and proportion of carotid revascularization procedures by operative approach. Results: A total of 108676 patients (mean [SD] age 56.6 [12.5] years; 66 684 men [61.4%]) were included in the analysis. The most common operative approach overall was CEA (n = 81508 [75.0%]), followed by TFCAS (n = 15578 [14.3%]) and TCAR (n = 11590 [10.7%]). The number of procedures increased over the study period (16754 in 2015 vs 27269 in 2019; P <.001). In 2015, CEA was used in 84.9% of all cases, followed by TFCAS (14.4%) and TCAR (0.8%). In 2019, CEA was used in 64.8% of cases, followed by TCAR (21.9%) and TFCAS (13.3%). The proportional use of CEA decreased by 5.0% (95% CI, -7.4% to -2.6%) per year, and TCAR use increased by 5.3% (95% CI, 2.3%-8.3%) per year. Among patients at high risk, the change was greater: CEA use decreased by 7.8% (95% CI, -11.9% to -3.8%) per year, TFCAS decreased by 4.8% (95% CI, -9.5% to -0.14%) per year, and TCAR increased by 12.6% (95% CI, 7.1%-18.1%) per year. Multinomial logistic regression showed that patient risk status was the most important characteristic associated with TCAR compared with CEA (relative risk ratio, 36.10; 95% CI, 29.24-44.66; P <.001) and TFCAS (relative risk ratio, 14.10; 95% CI, 11.86-16.66; P <.001). Linear regression revealed no association between year of surgery and in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, or mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study indicate that TCAR has become the dominant carotid revascularization approach, surpassing TFCAS and CEA in patients at high risk for stroke, cranial nerve injury, or cardiovascular events. Patient high-risk status was the main characteristic associated with a stenting approach, highlighting the perceived importance of carotid stenting therapies in this patient population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138453842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138453842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31944
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31944
M3 - Article
C2 - 36112371
AN - SCOPUS:85138453842
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 5
SP - E2231944
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
IS - 9
ER -