TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Patients’ Protected Health Information to Solicit Hospital Funds
T2 - How did This Practice Come About?
AU - Mahajan, Uma V.
AU - Wafapoor, Vahid
AU - Mahajan, Omkar A.
AU - Anderson, William S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Modifications to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) have allowed for the disclosure of patient protected health information (PHI) for the purpose of hospital fundraising. The public has recently raised ethical concerns regarding these practices. We examined the forces that brought about these HIPAA modifications. We first examined 304 comments submitted to the proposed rule for the HIPPA regulation modifications. We additionally queried the OpenSecrets repository for lobbying activity by these commenters. We found that 57 out of the 304 comments pertained specifically to fundraising practices. The majority of comments were from hospital developmental (fundraising) offices (51%, 29 of 57 comments), and the majority (96%, 24 of 25 hospital comments; 83%, 34 of 41 total comments discussing PHI disclosure) supported additional PHI disclosure. There was a paucity of comments from physician organizations (1 of 57) and patient advocates (2 of 57). The majority of lobbying dollars (95% of over $81 million) were from commenters who favored the modifications. The lack of physician and patient representation in the rule-making process likely contributed to the creation of regulations that elicit ethical concerns in physicians, and potential harm for patients.
AB - Modifications to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) have allowed for the disclosure of patient protected health information (PHI) for the purpose of hospital fundraising. The public has recently raised ethical concerns regarding these practices. We examined the forces that brought about these HIPAA modifications. We first examined 304 comments submitted to the proposed rule for the HIPPA regulation modifications. We additionally queried the OpenSecrets repository for lobbying activity by these commenters. We found that 57 out of the 304 comments pertained specifically to fundraising practices. The majority of comments were from hospital developmental (fundraising) offices (51%, 29 of 57 comments), and the majority (96%, 24 of 25 hospital comments; 83%, 34 of 41 total comments discussing PHI disclosure) supported additional PHI disclosure. There was a paucity of comments from physician organizations (1 of 57) and patient advocates (2 of 57). The majority of lobbying dollars (95% of over $81 million) were from commenters who favored the modifications. The lack of physician and patient representation in the rule-making process likely contributed to the creation of regulations that elicit ethical concerns in physicians, and potential harm for patients.
KW - HIPAA modifications
KW - grateful patient programs
KW - hospital fundraising
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131528903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131528903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23743735221106604
DO - 10.1177/23743735221106604
M3 - Article
C2 - 35694011
AN - SCOPUS:85131528903
SN - 2374-3735
VL - 9
JO - Journal of Patient Experience
JF - Journal of Patient Experience
ER -