TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Nutrition Standards to Improve Nutritional Quality of Hospital Patient Meals
T2 - Findings from New York City's Healthy Hospital Food Initiative
AU - Moran, Alyssa
AU - Lederer, Ashley
AU - Johnson Curtis, Christine
N1 - Funding Information:
FUNDING/SUPPORT The Healthy Hospital Food Initiative was supported by the Community Transformation Grant (grant #1U58DP003689) and Sodium Reduction in Communities (grant #1U58DP003067) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . This publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Background: Most hospital patient meals are considered regular-diet meals; these meals are not required to meet comprehensive nutrition standards for a healthy diet. Although programs exist to improve nutrition in hospital food, the focus is on retail settings such as vending machines and cafeterias vs patient meals. New York City's Healthy Hospital Food Initiative (HHFI) provides nutrition standards for regular-diet meals that hospitals can adopt, in addition to retail standards. Objective: This study was undertaken to describe regular-diet patient menus before and after implementation of the HHFI nutrition standards. Design: The study involved pre- and post- menu change analyses of hospitals participating in the HHFI between 2010 and 2014. Participants/setting: Eight New York City hospitals, selected based on voluntary participation in the HHFI, were included in the analyses. Main outcome measures: Nutritional content of regular-diet menus were compared with the HHFI nutrition standards. Statistical analyses performed: Nutrient analysis and exact Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for the analysis of the data. Results: At baseline, no regular-diet menu met all HHFI standards, and most exceeded the daily limits for percentage of calories from fat (n=5), percentage of calories from saturated fat (n=5), and milligrams of sodium (n=6), and they did not meet the minimum grams of fiber (n=7). Hospitals met all key nutrient standards after implementation, increasing fiber (25%, P<0.01) and decreasing sodium (-19%, P<0.05), percentage of calories from fat (-24%, P<0.01), and percentage of calories from saturated fat (-21%, P<0.05). A significant increase was seen in fresh fruit servings (667%, P<0.05) and decreases in full-fat and reduced-fat milk servings (-100%, P<0.05), refined grain servings (-35%, P<0.05), and frequency of desserts (-92%, P<0.05). Conclusions: Regular diet menus did not comply with the HHFI nutrition standards at baseline. Using the HHFI framework, hospitals significantly improved the nutritional quality of regular-diet patient menus. The standards were applied across hospitals of varying sizes, locations, menu types, and food service operations, indicating feasibility of this framework in a range of hospital settings.
AB - Background: Most hospital patient meals are considered regular-diet meals; these meals are not required to meet comprehensive nutrition standards for a healthy diet. Although programs exist to improve nutrition in hospital food, the focus is on retail settings such as vending machines and cafeterias vs patient meals. New York City's Healthy Hospital Food Initiative (HHFI) provides nutrition standards for regular-diet meals that hospitals can adopt, in addition to retail standards. Objective: This study was undertaken to describe regular-diet patient menus before and after implementation of the HHFI nutrition standards. Design: The study involved pre- and post- menu change analyses of hospitals participating in the HHFI between 2010 and 2014. Participants/setting: Eight New York City hospitals, selected based on voluntary participation in the HHFI, were included in the analyses. Main outcome measures: Nutritional content of regular-diet menus were compared with the HHFI nutrition standards. Statistical analyses performed: Nutrient analysis and exact Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for the analysis of the data. Results: At baseline, no regular-diet menu met all HHFI standards, and most exceeded the daily limits for percentage of calories from fat (n=5), percentage of calories from saturated fat (n=5), and milligrams of sodium (n=6), and they did not meet the minimum grams of fiber (n=7). Hospitals met all key nutrient standards after implementation, increasing fiber (25%, P<0.01) and decreasing sodium (-19%, P<0.05), percentage of calories from fat (-24%, P<0.01), and percentage of calories from saturated fat (-21%, P<0.05). A significant increase was seen in fresh fruit servings (667%, P<0.05) and decreases in full-fat and reduced-fat milk servings (-100%, P<0.05), refined grain servings (-35%, P<0.05), and frequency of desserts (-92%, P<0.05). Conclusions: Regular diet menus did not comply with the HHFI nutrition standards at baseline. Using the HHFI framework, hospitals significantly improved the nutritional quality of regular-diet patient menus. The standards were applied across hospitals of varying sizes, locations, menu types, and food service operations, indicating feasibility of this framework in a range of hospital settings.
KW - Food policy
KW - Food service
KW - Hospital
KW - Obesity
KW - Patient meals
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945465834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945465834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2015.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2015.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 26320410
AN - SCOPUS:84945465834
SN - 2212-2672
VL - 115
SP - 1847
EP - 1854
JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
IS - 11
ER -