TY - JOUR
T1 - Uranium exposure in american indian communities
T2 - Health, policy, and the way forward
AU - Redvers, Nicole
AU - Chischilly, Ann Marie
AU - Warne, Donald
AU - Pino, Manuel
AU - Lyon-Colbert, Amber
N1 - Funding Information:
Overall, we have seen a serious and immediate need for better coordination of uranium-related water testing, reporting, and mitigation efforts in addition to more support for the implementation of best practices in tribal communities in the United States. We therefore propose that the following seven policy recommendations should be operationalized to ensure reservation communities at risk of uranium and related exposures do not continue to suffer continued health disparities due a preventable public health risk: Increase funding for drinking-water quality monitoring and infrastructure on tribal lands. Tribes currently have various sources of water-quality monitoring funding from federal agencies. The U.S. EPA offers several programs, including funding through the CWA Section 106 Water Pollution Control, CWA Section 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, CWA Section 104(b)(3) Wetlands Grants, and the CWA Tribal Set-Aside grant program. As of 2020, the U.S. EPA typically awards grants between the amounts of $40,000 and $200,000, with first-time applicants eligible for $40,000 grants (U.S. EPA 2020e). In 2019, the U.S. EPA announced that it was offering $2.5 million to restore and protect water quality in a competitive grant process for the 574 tribes, which would equate to ∼ $4,355 per tribe if split evenly; however, the maximum project budget was $100,000, which would mean full funding for only 25 tribes if the maximum amount was requested by 25 tribes, consequently leaving out 549 tribes (U.S. EPA 2019). Tribes have, therefore, continuously advocated for more funding for water-quality testing and monitoring for their regions given the various barriers in place in accessing the current grants available.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Uranium contamination of drinking-water sources on American Indian (AI) reservations in the United States is a largely ignored and underfunded public health crisis. With an estimated 40% of the headwaters in the western U.S. watershed, home to many AI reservation communities, being contaminated with untreated mine waste, the potential health effects have largely been unexplored. With AI populations already facing contin-ued and progressive economic and social marginalization, higher prevalence of chronic disease, and systemic discrimination, associations between various toxicant exposures, including uranium, and various chronic conditions, need further examination. OBJECTIVES: Uranium’s health effects, in addition to considerations for uranium drinking-water testing, reporting, and mitigation in reference to AI communities through the lens of water quality, is reviewed. DISCUSSION: A series of environmental health policy recommendations are described with the intent to proactively improve responsiveness to the water quality crisis in AI reservation communities in the United States specific to uranium. There is a serious and immediate need for better coordination of uranium-related drinking-water testing and reporting on reservations in the United States that will better support and guide best practices for uranium mitigation efforts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7537.
AB - BACKGROUND: Uranium contamination of drinking-water sources on American Indian (AI) reservations in the United States is a largely ignored and underfunded public health crisis. With an estimated 40% of the headwaters in the western U.S. watershed, home to many AI reservation communities, being contaminated with untreated mine waste, the potential health effects have largely been unexplored. With AI populations already facing contin-ued and progressive economic and social marginalization, higher prevalence of chronic disease, and systemic discrimination, associations between various toxicant exposures, including uranium, and various chronic conditions, need further examination. OBJECTIVES: Uranium’s health effects, in addition to considerations for uranium drinking-water testing, reporting, and mitigation in reference to AI communities through the lens of water quality, is reviewed. DISCUSSION: A series of environmental health policy recommendations are described with the intent to proactively improve responsiveness to the water quality crisis in AI reservation communities in the United States specific to uranium. There is a serious and immediate need for better coordination of uranium-related drinking-water testing and reporting on reservations in the United States that will better support and guide best practices for uranium mitigation efforts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7537.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103522863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103522863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1289/EHP7537
DO - 10.1289/EHP7537
M3 - Article
C2 - 33769848
AN - SCOPUS:85103522863
SN - 0091-6765
VL - 129
JO - Environmental health perspectives
JF - Environmental health perspectives
IS - 3
M1 - 035002
ER -