TY - JOUR
T1 - Universal Risk Prediction for Individuals With and Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
AU - Mok, Yejin
AU - Dardari, Zeina
AU - Sang, Yingying
AU - Hu, Xiao
AU - Bancks, Michael P.
AU - Mathews, Lena
AU - Hoogeveen, Ron C.
AU - Koton, Silvia
AU - Blaha, Michael J.
AU - Post, Wendy S.
AU - Ballantyne, Christie M.
AU - Coresh, Josef
AU - Rosamond, Wayne
AU - Matsushita, Kunihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2024/2/6
Y1 - 2024/2/6
N2 - Background: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend distinct risk classification systems for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. However, both systems rely on similar predictors (eg, age and diabetes), indicating the possibility of a universal risk prediction approach for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Objectives: The authors examined the performance of predictors in persons with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and developed and validated a universal risk prediction model. Methods: Among 9,138 ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) participants with (n = 609) and without (n = 8,529) ASCVD at baseline (1996-1998), we examined established predictors in the risk classification systems and other predictors, such as body mass index and cardiac biomarkers (troponin and natriuretic peptide), using Cox models with MACEs (myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). We also evaluated model performance. Results: Over a follow-up of approximately 20 years, there were 3,209 MACEs (2,797 for no prior ASCVD). Most predictors showed similar associations with MACE regardless of baseline ASCVD status. A universal risk prediction model with the predictors (eg, established predictors, cardiac biomarkers) identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and bootstrapping showed good discrimination for both groups (c-statistics of 0.747 and 0.691, respectively), and risk classification and showed excellent calibration, irrespective of ASCVD status. This universal prediction approach identified individuals without ASCVD who had a higher risk than some individuals with ASCVD and was validated externally in 5,322 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Conclusions: A universal risk prediction approach performed well in persons with and without ASCVD. This approach could facilitate the transition from primary to secondary prevention by streamlining risk classification and discussion between clinicians and patients.
AB - Background: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend distinct risk classification systems for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. However, both systems rely on similar predictors (eg, age and diabetes), indicating the possibility of a universal risk prediction approach for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Objectives: The authors examined the performance of predictors in persons with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and developed and validated a universal risk prediction model. Methods: Among 9,138 ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) participants with (n = 609) and without (n = 8,529) ASCVD at baseline (1996-1998), we examined established predictors in the risk classification systems and other predictors, such as body mass index and cardiac biomarkers (troponin and natriuretic peptide), using Cox models with MACEs (myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). We also evaluated model performance. Results: Over a follow-up of approximately 20 years, there were 3,209 MACEs (2,797 for no prior ASCVD). Most predictors showed similar associations with MACE regardless of baseline ASCVD status. A universal risk prediction model with the predictors (eg, established predictors, cardiac biomarkers) identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and bootstrapping showed good discrimination for both groups (c-statistics of 0.747 and 0.691, respectively), and risk classification and showed excellent calibration, irrespective of ASCVD status. This universal prediction approach identified individuals without ASCVD who had a higher risk than some individuals with ASCVD and was validated externally in 5,322 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Conclusions: A universal risk prediction approach performed well in persons with and without ASCVD. This approach could facilitate the transition from primary to secondary prevention by streamlining risk classification and discussion between clinicians and patients.
KW - atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
KW - heart failure
KW - prevention
KW - risk prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183054453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183054453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.11.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 38296400
AN - SCOPUS:85183054453
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 83
SP - 562
EP - 573
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -