TY - JOUR
T1 - Underutilization of Needle Biopsy Before Breast Surgery
T2 - A Measure of Low-Value Care
AU - Gilmore, Richard C.
AU - Wang, Peiqi
AU - Kaczmarski, Katerina
AU - Hutfless, Susan
AU - Euhus, David M.
AU - Jacobs, Lisa K.
AU - Habibi, Mehran
AU - Lange, Julie
AU - Camp, Melissa
AU - Makary, Martin A.
N1 - Funding Information:
One approach to the problem of unwarranted practice variation is internal data transparency. The aforementioned Commission on Cancer has created a national quality metrics program among centers accredited by its body to alert providers to their breast CNB usage rate; others have successfully implemented regional quality initiatives., Societies such as the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) have found success with quality improvement strategies at the National Society level. In 2016, they initiated a national quality collaborative as part of a broader multispecialty national quality improvement endeavor called Improving Wisely, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and based at Johns Hopkins University. The project uses a physician performance metric developed and endorsed by the respective specialty association to inform physicians of their individual performance data in a confidential and non-punitive data report. Improvement among outliers in this project is based on the conceptual model that (1) outliers may be unaware that they are outliers; (2) no-one wants to be an outlier; and (3) a civil, confidential, peer-to-peer data-sharing dialog in the spirit of improvement is an effective way to engage physicians. These reported data serve as a baseline assessment for subsequent analyses and as a benchmark group for quality improvement efforts. Furthermore, for the clear majority of physicians who are not outliers, the data transparency helps to positively reinforce non-outlier practice patterns and create broader awareness among peers in the specialty, who may be in a position to help outliers. We believe that the same model can be applied to quality metrics in breast care on a National Society level.
Funding Information:
Funding for this work was provided by the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation at Johns Hopkins University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) can obviate the need for breast surgery in patients with an unknown breast lesion; however, variation in compliance with this guideline may represent a disparity in health care and a surrogate measure of unnecessary surgery. We evaluated variation in breast CNB rates prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using Medicare claims from 2015 to 2017 to evaluate the proportion of patients who received a CNB within 6 months prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Outlier practice pattern was defined as a preoperative CNB rate ≤ 70%. Logistic regression was used to evaluate surgeon characteristics associated with outlier practice pattern. Results: We identified 108,935 female patients who underwent initial breast cancer surgery performed by 3229 surgeons from July 2015 to June 2017. The mean CNB rate was 86.7%. A total of 7.7% of surgeons had a CNB performed prior to initial breast surgery ≤ 70% of the time, and 2.0% had a CNB performed ≤ 50% of the time. Outlier breast surgeons were associated with practicing in a micropolitan area (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.73), in the South (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20–2.84) or West region (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11–2.86), > 20 years in practice (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09–2.11), and low breast cancer surgery volume (< 30 cases in the study period; OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.75–5.90). Conclusions: Marked variation exists in whether a breast core biopsy is performed prior to initial breast surgery, which may represent unnecessary surgery on individual patients. Providing surgeon-specific feedback on guideline compliance may reduce unwarranted variation.
AB - Background: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) can obviate the need for breast surgery in patients with an unknown breast lesion; however, variation in compliance with this guideline may represent a disparity in health care and a surrogate measure of unnecessary surgery. We evaluated variation in breast CNB rates prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using Medicare claims from 2015 to 2017 to evaluate the proportion of patients who received a CNB within 6 months prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Outlier practice pattern was defined as a preoperative CNB rate ≤ 70%. Logistic regression was used to evaluate surgeon characteristics associated with outlier practice pattern. Results: We identified 108,935 female patients who underwent initial breast cancer surgery performed by 3229 surgeons from July 2015 to June 2017. The mean CNB rate was 86.7%. A total of 7.7% of surgeons had a CNB performed prior to initial breast surgery ≤ 70% of the time, and 2.0% had a CNB performed ≤ 50% of the time. Outlier breast surgeons were associated with practicing in a micropolitan area (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.73), in the South (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20–2.84) or West region (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11–2.86), > 20 years in practice (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09–2.11), and low breast cancer surgery volume (< 30 cases in the study period; OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.75–5.90). Conclusions: Marked variation exists in whether a breast core biopsy is performed prior to initial breast surgery, which may represent unnecessary surgery on individual patients. Providing surgeon-specific feedback on guideline compliance may reduce unwarranted variation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099911468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099911468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-020-09340-6
DO - 10.1245/s10434-020-09340-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33512674
AN - SCOPUS:85099911468
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 28
SP - 2485
EP - 2492
JO - Annals of surgical oncology
JF - Annals of surgical oncology
IS - 5
ER -