TY - JOUR
T1 - Training and working in high-stakes environments
T2 - Lessons learned and problems shared by aviators and surgeons
AU - Schwaitzberg, Steven D.
AU - Godinez, Charles
AU - Kavic, Stephen M.
AU - Sutton, Erica
AU - Worthington, Raymond B.
AU - Colburn, Brian
AU - Park, Adrian
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Surgeons and naval aviators are both trained to work in high-stakes environments. Any misadventure in either of their working worlds can lead to death. Yet the pathways to certification and implicit attitudes toward training are quite different in these 2 disciplines and provide an opportunity to compare and contrast the methodologies employed. At the 5th annual Innovations in the Surgical Environments Conference, senior and junior aviators and surgeons shared their experiences from the perspective of trainee and trainer and in the process presented an interesting study in parallels and contrasts. The US Navy follows a highly regimented training syllabus with graduated levels of responsibility designed to create the safest possible flying environment. Extensive preflight and postflight effort is required for each mission flown. Surgical training is also hierarchal in responsibility, but graduates demonstrate greater variability in their training experience. The surgical field can only fortify its emphasis on safety by seeking to provide the optimal training experiences necessary in the high-stakes environment of the operating theater. In doing so, surgeons may find reinvigorated commitment through study of the aviation industry's established methods of training and practice.
AB - Surgeons and naval aviators are both trained to work in high-stakes environments. Any misadventure in either of their working worlds can lead to death. Yet the pathways to certification and implicit attitudes toward training are quite different in these 2 disciplines and provide an opportunity to compare and contrast the methodologies employed. At the 5th annual Innovations in the Surgical Environments Conference, senior and junior aviators and surgeons shared their experiences from the perspective of trainee and trainer and in the process presented an interesting study in parallels and contrasts. The US Navy follows a highly regimented training syllabus with graduated levels of responsibility designed to create the safest possible flying environment. Extensive preflight and postflight effort is required for each mission flown. Surgical training is also hierarchal in responsibility, but graduates demonstrate greater variability in their training experience. The surgical field can only fortify its emphasis on safety by seeking to provide the optimal training experiences necessary in the high-stakes environment of the operating theater. In doing so, surgeons may find reinvigorated commitment through study of the aviation industry's established methods of training and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649625541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649625541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1553350609339170
DO - 10.1177/1553350609339170
M3 - Article
C2 - 19546125
AN - SCOPUS:67649625541
SN - 1553-3506
VL - 16
SP - 187
EP - 195
JO - Surgical Innovation
JF - Surgical Innovation
IS - 2
ER -