Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Johns Hopkins University Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Thomas R. Gadacz, Mark A. Talamini
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
179
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Cholecystectomy
100%
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
100%
Minimally Invasive Procedures
33%
Hospital Stay
33%
Patient Outcomes
33%
Laparoscopic Approach
33%
Gallbladder
33%
Operative Time
33%
Patient Selection
33%
Surgical Skills
33%
Morbid Obesity
33%
Hospital Costs
33%
Early Return
33%
Credentialing
33%
Cholecystitis
33%
Abdominal Sepsis
33%
Bile Duct Injury
33%
Return to Normal
33%
Ileus
33%
Bleeding Disorders
33%
Nursing and Health Professions
Cholecystectomy
100%
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
100%
Hospitalization
33%
Treatment Outcome
33%
Accreditation
33%
Cholecystitis
33%
Hospital Cost
33%
Contraindication
33%
Sepsis
33%
Operation Duration
33%
Morbid Obesity
33%
Bile Duct Injury
33%
Ileus
33%
Minimally Invasive Procedure
33%
Bleeding Disorder
33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Sepsis
100%
Morbid Obesity
100%
Bile Duct Injury
100%
Cholecystitis
100%
Ileus
100%
Bleeding Disorder
100%
Medicine and Dentistry
Cholecystectomy
100%
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
100%
Minimally Invasive Procedure
33%
Sepsis
33%
Operation Duration
33%
Morbid Obesity
33%
Hospital Cost
33%
Contraindication
33%
Cholecystitis
33%
Bile Duct Injury
33%
Bleeding Disorder
33%
Ileus
33%