TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards Core Competencies for Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) Training
T2 - Results From a Global Mapping and Consensus-Building Process
AU - Schleiff, Meike J.
AU - Rangnekar, Avanti
AU - Gomez, Francisco Oviedo
AU - Teddy, Gina
AU - Peters, David H.
AU - Balabanova, Dina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: As the field of health policy and systems research (HPSR) continues to grow, there is a recognition of the need for training in HPSR. This aspiration has translated into a multitude of teaching programmes of variable scope and quality, reflecting a lack of consensus on the skills and practices required for rigorous HPSR. The purpose of this paper is to identify an agreed set of core competencies for HPSR researchers, building on the previous work by the Health Systems Global (HSG) Thematic Working Group on Teaching & Learning. Methods: Our methods involved an iterative approach of four phases including a literature review, key informant interviews and group discussions with HPSR educators, and webinars with pre-post surveys capturing views among the global HPSR community. The phased discussions and consensus-building contributed to the evolution of the HPSR competency domains and competencies framework. Results: Emerging domains included understanding health systems complexity, assessing policies and programs, appraising data and evidence, ethical reasoning and practice, leading and mentoring, building partnerships, and translating and utilizing knowledge and HPSR evidence. The development of competencies and their application were often seen as a continuous process spanning evidence generation, partnering, communicating and helping to identify new critical health systems questions. Conclusion: The HPSR competency set can be seen as a useful reference point in the teaching and practice of high-quality HPSR and can be adapted based on national priorities, the particularities of local contexts, and the needs of stakeholders (HPSR researchers and educators), as well as practitioners and policy-makers. Further research is needed in using the core competency set to design national training programmes, develop locally relevant benchmarks and assessment methods, and evaluate their use in different settings.
AB - Background: As the field of health policy and systems research (HPSR) continues to grow, there is a recognition of the need for training in HPSR. This aspiration has translated into a multitude of teaching programmes of variable scope and quality, reflecting a lack of consensus on the skills and practices required for rigorous HPSR. The purpose of this paper is to identify an agreed set of core competencies for HPSR researchers, building on the previous work by the Health Systems Global (HSG) Thematic Working Group on Teaching & Learning. Methods: Our methods involved an iterative approach of four phases including a literature review, key informant interviews and group discussions with HPSR educators, and webinars with pre-post surveys capturing views among the global HPSR community. The phased discussions and consensus-building contributed to the evolution of the HPSR competency domains and competencies framework. Results: Emerging domains included understanding health systems complexity, assessing policies and programs, appraising data and evidence, ethical reasoning and practice, leading and mentoring, building partnerships, and translating and utilizing knowledge and HPSR evidence. The development of competencies and their application were often seen as a continuous process spanning evidence generation, partnering, communicating and helping to identify new critical health systems questions. Conclusion: The HPSR competency set can be seen as a useful reference point in the teaching and practice of high-quality HPSR and can be adapted based on national priorities, the particularities of local contexts, and the needs of stakeholders (HPSR researchers and educators), as well as practitioners and policy-makers. Further research is needed in using the core competency set to design national training programmes, develop locally relevant benchmarks and assessment methods, and evaluate their use in different settings.
KW - Competency Based Education
KW - Health Systems Research
KW - Stakeholder Engagement
KW - Workforce
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135230856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135230856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.258
DO - 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.258
M3 - Article
C2 - 33590742
AN - SCOPUS:85135230856
SN - 2322-5939
VL - 11
SP - 1058
EP - 1068
JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
IS - 7
ER -