TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward the Development of the Perfect Medical Team
T2 - Critical Components for Adaptation
AU - Gregory, Megan E.
AU - Hughes, Ashley M.
AU - Benishek, Lauren E.
AU - Sonesh, Shirley C.
AU - Lazzara, Elizabeth H.
AU - Woodard, Le Chauncy D.
AU - Salas, Eduardo
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Academic Affiliations, Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research Advanced Fellowship, in part by the Office of Academic Affiliations, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education, and in part by Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas. This work was supported in part by grants NNX16AP96G and NNX16AB08G from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to Rice University.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Objective: Medical teams play a vital role in the delivery of safe and effective patient care. Toward the goal of becoming a high-reliability health system, the authors posit that the “perfect” medical team is one that develops their attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions (ABCs) to facilitate adaptation. Methods: The authors synthesized the literature (frameworks, measures, and conceptual models) on teamwork in healthcare (k = 161) to develop an evidence-based model of ABCs, which current evidence suggests, are requisite for medical team adaptation. Clinical vignettes were garnered from the media and other sources to illustrate how these ABCs—or failure in using these ABCs—can lead to positive or negative events in healthcare. Results: The resulting model contains the most frequently included ABCs in healthcare teamwork models, measures, and frameworks: psychological safety (41, 25.5%), situation assessment (66, 41.0%), shared mental models (56, 34.8%), team leadership behaviors (78, 48.4%), role awareness (64, 39.7%), team decision-making (61, 37.9%) and planning (41, 25.5%), conflict management (51, 31.7%), task coordination (71, 44.1%), adaptation (46, 28.6%), and backup behavior (54, 33.5%). The authors posit that communication and organizational conditions—other highly cited components—(141, 87.6%, and 90, 55.9%, respectively) serve as moderators of these relationships. Conclusions: The authors argue that each of these ABCs is critical for enhancing team adaptation and subsequently increasing patient safety. A list of practical tools and educational strategies that teams and organizations can use to improve their performance on each of these ABCs is provided.
AB - Objective: Medical teams play a vital role in the delivery of safe and effective patient care. Toward the goal of becoming a high-reliability health system, the authors posit that the “perfect” medical team is one that develops their attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions (ABCs) to facilitate adaptation. Methods: The authors synthesized the literature (frameworks, measures, and conceptual models) on teamwork in healthcare (k = 161) to develop an evidence-based model of ABCs, which current evidence suggests, are requisite for medical team adaptation. Clinical vignettes were garnered from the media and other sources to illustrate how these ABCs—or failure in using these ABCs—can lead to positive or negative events in healthcare. Results: The resulting model contains the most frequently included ABCs in healthcare teamwork models, measures, and frameworks: psychological safety (41, 25.5%), situation assessment (66, 41.0%), shared mental models (56, 34.8%), team leadership behaviors (78, 48.4%), role awareness (64, 39.7%), team decision-making (61, 37.9%) and planning (41, 25.5%), conflict management (51, 31.7%), task coordination (71, 44.1%), adaptation (46, 28.6%), and backup behavior (54, 33.5%). The authors posit that communication and organizational conditions—other highly cited components—(141, 87.6%, and 90, 55.9%, respectively) serve as moderators of these relationships. Conclusions: The authors argue that each of these ABCs is critical for enhancing team adaptation and subsequently increasing patient safety. A list of practical tools and educational strategies that teams and organizations can use to improve their performance on each of these ABCs is provided.
KW - adaptation
KW - framework
KW - teams
KW - teamwork
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078165511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078165511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000598
DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000598
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33635843
AN - SCOPUS:85078165511
SN - 1549-8417
VL - 17
SP - E47-E70
JO - Journal of patient safety
JF - Journal of patient safety
IS - 2
ER -