TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a new definition of glaucomatous optic neuropathy for clinical research
AU - Iyer, Jayant
AU - Vianna, Jayme R.
AU - Chauhan, Balwantray C.
AU - Quigley, Harry A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Purpose of review A process is ongoing to produce a definition of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) using quantitative, objective data from structural and functional tests. At present, a common practice is to define GON by subjective features said to be 'characteristic' as judged by those experienced in glaucoma care. Recent findings An objective definition would standardize the comparison of clinical research results across studies, without precluding simultaneous use of idiosyncratic definitions in the same reports. To achieve this goal, expert opinion was solicited to reach optimal agreement on one or more consensus, GON definitions. An interactive period of online discussion by 176 international experts led to 110 responses in an online survey that narrowed possible definitional structures into testable criteria. Summary Two approaches to validation of one or more sets of criteria for definite and possible GON are ongoing. The general principles include definition for each eye individually, inclusion of a borderline category, no intraocular pressure criterion, and both structural and functional defects in appropriate physical locations. Each validation approach uses clinician diagnosis as a standard against which objective criteria are compared, with the initial approach using a three-level categorical scale, and the second approach using 0 - 100 scaling.
AB - Purpose of review A process is ongoing to produce a definition of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) using quantitative, objective data from structural and functional tests. At present, a common practice is to define GON by subjective features said to be 'characteristic' as judged by those experienced in glaucoma care. Recent findings An objective definition would standardize the comparison of clinical research results across studies, without precluding simultaneous use of idiosyncratic definitions in the same reports. To achieve this goal, expert opinion was solicited to reach optimal agreement on one or more consensus, GON definitions. An interactive period of online discussion by 176 international experts led to 110 responses in an online survey that narrowed possible definitional structures into testable criteria. Summary Two approaches to validation of one or more sets of criteria for definite and possible GON are ongoing. The general principles include definition for each eye individually, inclusion of a borderline category, no intraocular pressure criterion, and both structural and functional defects in appropriate physical locations. Each validation approach uses clinician diagnosis as a standard against which objective criteria are compared, with the initial approach using a three-level categorical scale, and the second approach using 0 - 100 scaling.
KW - definition
KW - glaucoma
KW - optical coherence tomography
KW - research
KW - visual field
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079020038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079020038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000644
DO - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000644
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31922980
AN - SCOPUS:85079020038
SN - 1040-8738
VL - 31
SP - 85
EP - 90
JO - Current opinion in ophthalmology
JF - Current opinion in ophthalmology
IS - 2
ER -