TY - JOUR
T1 - Thresholds for the perception of pressure, sharpness, and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain
T2 - Effects of laterality and repeated testing
AU - Greenspan, Joel D.
AU - Mcgillis, Sandra L.B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NSF Grant No. BNS-8808337 and by the Department of Neurosurgery, SUNY Health Science Center at Syracuse.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Twenty-four healthy human subjects provided thresholds for their perception of pressure, sharpness, and pain. Mechanical forces were applied to the dorsal surface of the digits with flat-tipped probes of various sizes. Thresholds (expressed as force) increased with increasing probe size, as previously described. There was no evidence of a laterality difference for any of the thresholds. There was a trend for increasing thresholds with repeated testing, but this trend was not statistically significant for the group as a whole. Examination of individual subjects' thresholds over time revealed that 27% showed significant increases in pain threshold over the 15 days of testing. In contrast, only 6% of subjects showed significant increases in sharpness or pressure thresholds over the same period. Thus, whereas most subjects exhibited stable pain thresholds, approximately one-fourth showed significant increases in pain threshold over time. We conclude that for evaluating regional dysesthesia or hemidysesthesia, a right-left difference in pain thresholds will provide a more sensitive and reliable measure than absolute pain threshold.
AB - Twenty-four healthy human subjects provided thresholds for their perception of pressure, sharpness, and pain. Mechanical forces were applied to the dorsal surface of the digits with flat-tipped probes of various sizes. Thresholds (expressed as force) increased with increasing probe size, as previously described. There was no evidence of a laterality difference for any of the thresholds. There was a trend for increasing thresholds with repeated testing, but this trend was not statistically significant for the group as a whole. Examination of individual subjects' thresholds over time revealed that 27% showed significant increases in pain threshold over the 15 days of testing. In contrast, only 6% of subjects showed significant increases in sharpness or pressure thresholds over the same period. Thus, whereas most subjects exhibited stable pain thresholds, approximately one-fourth showed significant increases in pain threshold over time. We conclude that for evaluating regional dysesthesia or hemidysesthesia, a right-left difference in pain thresholds will provide a more sensitive and reliable measure than absolute pain threshold.
KW - Mechanical nociception
KW - Pain
KW - Pressure
KW - Psychophysics
KW - Sharpness
KW - Skin senses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028625628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028625628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/08990229409028875
DO - 10.3109/08990229409028875
M3 - Article
C2 - 7778408
AN - SCOPUS:0028625628
SN - 0899-0220
VL - 11
SP - 311
EP - 317
JO - Somatosensory & Motor Research
JF - Somatosensory & Motor Research
IS - 4
ER -