TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional fracture visualisation of multidetector CT of the skull base in trauma patients
T2 - Comparison of three reconstruction algorithms
AU - Ringl, Helmut
AU - Schernthaner, Ruediger
AU - Philipp, Marcel O.
AU - Metz-Schimmerl, Sylvia
AU - Czerny, Christian
AU - Weber, Michael
AU - Gäbler, Christian
AU - Steiner-Ringl, Andrea
AU - Peloschek, Philipp
AU - Herold, Christian J.
AU - Schima, Wolfgang
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the detection rate of skull-base fractures for three different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of cranial CT examinations in trauma patients. A total of 130 cranial CT examinations of patients with previous head trauma were subjected to 3D reconstruction of the skull base, using solid (SVR) and transparent (TVR) volume-rendering technique and maximum intensity projection (MIP). Three radiologists independently evaluated all reconstructions as well as standard high-resolution multiplanar reformations (HR-MPRs). Mean fracture detection rates for all readers reading rotating reconstructions were 39, 36, 61 and 64% for SVR, TVR, MIP and HR-MPR respectively. Although not significantly different from HR-MPR with respect to sensitivity (P = 0.9), MIP visualised 18% of fractures that were not reported in HR-MPR. Because of the relatively low detection rate using HR-MPRs alone, we recommend reading MIP reconstructions in addition to the obligatory HR-MPRs to improve fracture detection.
AB - The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the detection rate of skull-base fractures for three different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of cranial CT examinations in trauma patients. A total of 130 cranial CT examinations of patients with previous head trauma were subjected to 3D reconstruction of the skull base, using solid (SVR) and transparent (TVR) volume-rendering technique and maximum intensity projection (MIP). Three radiologists independently evaluated all reconstructions as well as standard high-resolution multiplanar reformations (HR-MPRs). Mean fracture detection rates for all readers reading rotating reconstructions were 39, 36, 61 and 64% for SVR, TVR, MIP and HR-MPR respectively. Although not significantly different from HR-MPR with respect to sensitivity (P = 0.9), MIP visualised 18% of fractures that were not reported in HR-MPR. Because of the relatively low detection rate using HR-MPRs alone, we recommend reading MIP reconstructions in addition to the obligatory HR-MPRs to improve fracture detection.
KW - 3D reconstruction
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Fracture
KW - Maximum intensity projection (MIP)
KW - Skull base
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349854810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349854810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-009-1435-1
DO - 10.1007/s00330-009-1435-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 19440716
AN - SCOPUS:70349854810
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 19
SP - 2416
EP - 2424
JO - European radiology
JF - European radiology
IS - 10
ER -