Three-dimensional fracture visualisation of multidetector CT of the skull base in trauma patients: Comparison of three reconstruction algorithms

Helmut Ringl, Ruediger Schernthaner, Marcel O. Philipp, Sylvia Metz-Schimmerl, Christian Czerny, Michael Weber, Christian Gäbler, Andrea Steiner-Ringl, Philipp Peloschek, Christian J. Herold, Wolfgang Schima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the detection rate of skull-base fractures for three different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of cranial CT examinations in trauma patients. A total of 130 cranial CT examinations of patients with previous head trauma were subjected to 3D reconstruction of the skull base, using solid (SVR) and transparent (TVR) volume-rendering technique and maximum intensity projection (MIP). Three radiologists independently evaluated all reconstructions as well as standard high-resolution multiplanar reformations (HR-MPRs). Mean fracture detection rates for all readers reading rotating reconstructions were 39, 36, 61 and 64% for SVR, TVR, MIP and HR-MPR respectively. Although not significantly different from HR-MPR with respect to sensitivity (P = 0.9), MIP visualised 18% of fractures that were not reported in HR-MPR. Because of the relatively low detection rate using HR-MPRs alone, we recommend reading MIP reconstructions in addition to the obligatory HR-MPRs to improve fracture detection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2416-2424
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean radiology
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 3D reconstruction
  • Computed tomography
  • Fracture
  • Maximum intensity projection (MIP)
  • Skull base
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three-dimensional fracture visualisation of multidetector CT of the skull base in trauma patients: Comparison of three reconstruction algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this