TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility and cost effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography for patients with uterine malignancies
AU - Bansal, Nisha
AU - Herzog, Thomas J.
AU - Brunner-Brown, Adrian
AU - Wethington, Stephanie L.
AU - Cohen, Carmel J.
AU - Burke, William M.
AU - Wright, Jason D.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Objective: To determine the utility and cost effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in detecting disease extent in patients with uterine carcinoma. Methods: Medical records of 762 patients with uterine malignancies at hysterectomy from 1990-2006 were reviewed. Study inclusion required preoperative abdominal-pelvic CT scan. All CT findings were correlated with intraoperative and pathologic data. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. Cost analysis was based on Medicare fee schedules. Results: 250 subjects (33%), who underwent preoperative CT, comprised the study cohort. CT suggested metastases in 22 (9%) cases and altered management in 7 (3%). Incidental findings were noted in 43 cases (17%), and altered management in 7 (3%). Among complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) and grade 1 endometrioid cancers, CT suggested metastases in 9% and demonstrated other incidental findings in 21%; management was altered in just 4% of patients. Similarly, among grade 2/3 endometrioid tumors, CT suggested metastases in 7%, and incidental findings in 14%; management was altered in 4% of cases. For high-risk histologies, CT altered management in 11% of papillary serous and clear cell cases and in 13% of sarcomas. CT findings more often altered management in women with high-risk histologies than in those with endometrioid carcinomas (p = 0.05). Expenditure of $17,622 for CT imaging is required to alter management of one patient. Conclusions: Preoperative CT is costly, and rarely alters management in patients with uterine neoplasms, particularly among endometrioid carcinomas. CT may be beneficial in patients with high-risk histologies and requires further study.
AB - Objective: To determine the utility and cost effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in detecting disease extent in patients with uterine carcinoma. Methods: Medical records of 762 patients with uterine malignancies at hysterectomy from 1990-2006 were reviewed. Study inclusion required preoperative abdominal-pelvic CT scan. All CT findings were correlated with intraoperative and pathologic data. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. Cost analysis was based on Medicare fee schedules. Results: 250 subjects (33%), who underwent preoperative CT, comprised the study cohort. CT suggested metastases in 22 (9%) cases and altered management in 7 (3%). Incidental findings were noted in 43 cases (17%), and altered management in 7 (3%). Among complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) and grade 1 endometrioid cancers, CT suggested metastases in 9% and demonstrated other incidental findings in 21%; management was altered in just 4% of patients. Similarly, among grade 2/3 endometrioid tumors, CT suggested metastases in 7%, and incidental findings in 14%; management was altered in 4% of cases. For high-risk histologies, CT altered management in 11% of papillary serous and clear cell cases and in 13% of sarcomas. CT findings more often altered management in women with high-risk histologies than in those with endometrioid carcinomas (p = 0.05). Expenditure of $17,622 for CT imaging is required to alter management of one patient. Conclusions: Preoperative CT is costly, and rarely alters management in patients with uterine neoplasms, particularly among endometrioid carcinomas. CT may be beneficial in patients with high-risk histologies and requires further study.
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Endometrial cancer
KW - Radiologic imaging
KW - Uterine malignancies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649105429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649105429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 18789515
AN - SCOPUS:55649105429
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 111
SP - 208
EP - 212
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 2
ER -