TY - JOUR
T1 - The Tangible Benefits of Living Donation
T2 - Results of a Qualitative Study of Living Kidney Donors
AU - Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.
AU - Robin, Miriam
AU - Saha, Amrita
AU - Eno, Anne
AU - Lifshitz, Romi
AU - Waldram, Madeleine M.
AU - Getsin, Samantha N.
AU - Chu, Nadia M.
AU - Al Ammary, Fawaz
AU - Segev, Dorry L.
AU - Henderson, MacEy L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/10
Y1 - 2020/11/10
N2 - Background. The framework currently used for living kidney donor selection is based on estimation of acceptable donor risk, under the premise that benefits are only experienced by the recipient. However, some interdependent donors might experience tangible benefits from donation that cannot be considered in the current framework (ie, benefits experienced directly by the donor that improve their daily life, well-being, or livelihood). Methods. We conducted semistructured interviews with 56 living kidney donors regarding benefits experienced from donation. Using a qualitative descriptive and constant comparative approach, themes were derived inductively from interview transcripts by 2 independent coders; differences in coding were reconciled by consensus. Results. Of 56 participants, 30 were in interdependent relationships with their recipients (shared household and/or significant caregiving responsibilities). Tangible benefits identified by participants fell into 3 major categories: health and wellness benefits, time and financial benefits, and interpersonal benefits. Participants described motivations to donate a kidney based on a more nuanced understanding of the benefits of donation than accounted for by the current "acceptable risk" paradigm. Discussion. Tangible benefits for interdependent donors may shift the "acceptable risk" paradigm (where no benefit is assumed) of kidney donor evaluation to a risk/benefit paradigm more consistent with other surgical decision-making.
AB - Background. The framework currently used for living kidney donor selection is based on estimation of acceptable donor risk, under the premise that benefits are only experienced by the recipient. However, some interdependent donors might experience tangible benefits from donation that cannot be considered in the current framework (ie, benefits experienced directly by the donor that improve their daily life, well-being, or livelihood). Methods. We conducted semistructured interviews with 56 living kidney donors regarding benefits experienced from donation. Using a qualitative descriptive and constant comparative approach, themes were derived inductively from interview transcripts by 2 independent coders; differences in coding were reconciled by consensus. Results. Of 56 participants, 30 were in interdependent relationships with their recipients (shared household and/or significant caregiving responsibilities). Tangible benefits identified by participants fell into 3 major categories: health and wellness benefits, time and financial benefits, and interpersonal benefits. Participants described motivations to donate a kidney based on a more nuanced understanding of the benefits of donation than accounted for by the current "acceptable risk" paradigm. Discussion. Tangible benefits for interdependent donors may shift the "acceptable risk" paradigm (where no benefit is assumed) of kidney donor evaluation to a risk/benefit paradigm more consistent with other surgical decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097388944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097388944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001068
DO - 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001068
M3 - Article
C2 - 33204824
AN - SCOPUS:85097388944
SN - 2373-8731
VL - 6
SP - E626
JO - Transplantation Direct
JF - Transplantation Direct
IS - 12
ER -