The Role of Tissue Expanders in the Reconstruction of Proximal Hypospadias

OBJECTIVE: To report the technique and outcomes of tissue expansion (TE) for generating additional penile skin for urethroplasty and/or skin coverage during primary or redo hypospadias repair in penoscrotal transposition (PST) patients with a proximal hypospadias. METHODS: Proximal hypospadias and PST patients with a lack of penile skin, congenitally or after failed repair, who underwent TE assisted reconstruction were reviewed. TE were placed under the penile shaft and expanded skin was used for tubularized incised plate repair. Success was defined as urethral advancement to the corona or more distal with tension free skin coverage. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients underwent reconstruction including 16 as part of primary repair and for redo repairs in 8. Nine patients experienced expander extrusion and posturethroplasty complications occurred in 43.8% of primary repairs and 75.0% of redo repairs; a urethrocutaneous fistula was most common (n = 8). Overall, success was achieved in 87.5% of patients with postoperative meatal locations almost all coronal (45.8%) or glanular (50.0%). CONCLUSION: Proximal hypospadias reconstruction is challenging, and complications are not infrequent. TE is a useful alternative for complex patients with a skin paucity such that cutaneous coverage would be difficult following urethroplasty. Although the complication rate was 43.8% for primary repair, TE generated sufficient residual skin for success after additional reconstruction. For redo repair early use is most beneficial as there is more expandable skin. The pseudocapsules provide vascularized coverage to reinforce the urethra while there is sufficient skin to minimize the need for a skin graft for penile coverage.