TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of area-level influences on prostate cancer grade and stage at diagnosis
AU - Klassen, Ann C.
AU - Curriero, Frank C.
AU - Hong, Jean Hee
AU - Williams, Chyvette
AU - Kulldorff, Martin
AU - Meissner, Helen I.
AU - Alberg, Anthony
AU - Ensminger, Margaret
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a cooperative agreement between the Association of Schools of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Alberg is the recipient of a Preventive Oncology Academic Award from the National Cancer Institute.
PY - 2004/9
Y1 - 2004/9
N2 - Background. This research explores area-level social influences on prostate cancer, to test whether area-level influences explain disparities in U.S. prostate cancer burden. Methods. The authors geocoded 23,993 1992-1997 Maryland prostate cancer cases, and linked cases to 1990 census data. The authors examined the effect of 17 area-level social variables, measured at block group, tract, and county, modeling individual and multilevel predictors of later stage and higher tumor grade. Results. Younger age, black race, higher grade or ungraded tumors, and earlier year of diagnosis were associated with later stage. Block group percentage of white-collar workers (O.R. = 0.93, 95% C.I. = 0.89, 0.98), and county resources (O.R. = 0.94, 95% C.I. = 0.89, 0.98), were protective of later stage. Older age, black race, and earlier year of diagnosis were associated with higher grade. Block group income was protective for white men (O.R. = 0.92, 95% C.I. = 0.87, 0.96), but for all men, county resources increased risk of higher grade (O.R. = 1.23, 95% C.I. = 1.16, 1.31). Conclusions. Social resources did not significantly reduce racial differences. Results suggest tumor biology is related to relative resources, with better outcomes associated with greater small-area wealth in low-resource counties, but stage at diagnosis is associated with absolute resources, with better outcomes associated with higher small-area social class in high-resource counties.
AB - Background. This research explores area-level social influences on prostate cancer, to test whether area-level influences explain disparities in U.S. prostate cancer burden. Methods. The authors geocoded 23,993 1992-1997 Maryland prostate cancer cases, and linked cases to 1990 census data. The authors examined the effect of 17 area-level social variables, measured at block group, tract, and county, modeling individual and multilevel predictors of later stage and higher tumor grade. Results. Younger age, black race, higher grade or ungraded tumors, and earlier year of diagnosis were associated with later stage. Block group percentage of white-collar workers (O.R. = 0.93, 95% C.I. = 0.89, 0.98), and county resources (O.R. = 0.94, 95% C.I. = 0.89, 0.98), were protective of later stage. Older age, black race, and earlier year of diagnosis were associated with higher grade. Block group income was protective for white men (O.R. = 0.92, 95% C.I. = 0.87, 0.96), but for all men, county resources increased risk of higher grade (O.R. = 1.23, 95% C.I. = 1.16, 1.31). Conclusions. Social resources did not significantly reduce racial differences. Results suggest tumor biology is related to relative resources, with better outcomes associated with greater small-area wealth in low-resource counties, but stage at diagnosis is associated with absolute resources, with better outcomes associated with higher small-area social class in high-resource counties.
KW - Census
KW - Disparities
KW - Hierarchical modeling
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Social factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143071338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143071338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.031
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 15313082
AN - SCOPUS:4143071338
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 39
SP - 441
EP - 448
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
IS - 3
ER -