The robotic colorectal experience: an outcomes and learning curve analysis of 502 patients

Salvatore A. Parascandola, Michael L. Horsey, Salini Hota, Jessie Osborne Paull, Ada Graham, Natalie Pudalov, Savannah Smith, Richard Amdur, Vincent Obias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to present our experience with robotic colorectal surgery since its establishment at our institution in 2009. By examining the outcomes of over 500 patients, our experience provides a basis for assessing the introduction of a robotic platform in a colorectal practice. Specific measures investigated include intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes for all operations using the robotic platform. In addition, for our most commonly performed operations we wished to analyse the learning curve to improve operative proficiency. This is the largest single-surgeon robotic database analysed to date. Method: A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery by a single surgeon at the George Washington University Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Additionally, an operating time learning curve analysis was performed. Results: Inclusion criteria identified 502 patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery between October 2009 and December 2018. The most common indications for surgery were diverticulitis (22.9%), colon adenocarcinoma (22.1%) and rectal adenocarcinoma (19.5%). The most common operations were anterior/low anterior resection (33.9%), right hemicolectomy/ileocaecectomy (24.9%) and left hemicolectomy/sigmoidectomy (21.9%). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 4.8%. The most common postoperative complications were wound infection (5.0%), anastomotic leakage (4.0%) and abscess formation (2.8%). The operating time learning curve plateaued at 55–65 cases for anterior and low anterior resection and 35–45 cases for left hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy. A clear learning curve was not seen in right hemicolectomy. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery can be performed in a diverse colorectal practice with low rates of conversion and postoperative complications. Plateau performance was achieved after 65 anterior/low anterior resections and 45 left and sigmoid colectomies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-236
Number of pages11
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • colon
  • colorectal
  • minimally invasive
  • rectal
  • robotic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The robotic colorectal experience: an outcomes and learning curve analysis of 502 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this