The myth of restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting

Karam Moon, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Michael R. Levitt, Azam S. Ahmed, M. Yashar S. Kalani, Cameron McDougall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reported rates of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) vary, and restenosis risk factors are poorly understood. We evaluated restenosis rates and risk factors, and compared patients with 'hostile-neck' carotids (a history of ipsilateral neck surgery or irradiation) and atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of patients undergoing cervical CAS between 1995 and 2010 with at least 1 month of follow-up were reviewed. Patients with substantial (≥50%) radiographic restenosis were compared with those without significant restenosis to identify restenosis risk factors.

RESULTS: The analysis included 121 patients with 133 stented vessels; 91 (68.4%) lesions were symptomatic. Indications for stent placement included hostile-neck lesions, substantial surgical comorbidities, inclusion in a randomized carotid stenting trial, acute carotid occlusion, tandem stenosis, large pseudoaneurysm, high carotid bifurcation, and contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy. Procedures were technically successful in all but one lesion (99.2%). Perioperative stroke occurred in four cases (3.0%). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 1-204 months), during which 23 vessels (17.3%) developed restenosis. Hostile-neck carotids (n=57) comprised 42.9% of all vessels treated and were responsible for 15 of 23 restenosis cases, resulting in a significantly higher restenosis rate than that of primary atherosclerotic lesions (26.3% vs 10.5%, p=0.017). By univariate analysis, the presence of calcified plaque was significantly associated with the incidence of in-stent restenosis (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: Restenosis rates after carotid angioplasty and stenting are low. Patients with a history of ipsilateral neck surgery or irradiation are at higher risk for substantial radiographic and symptomatic restenosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1006-1010
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • Angiography
  • Angioplasty
  • Plaque
  • Stent
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'The myth of restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this