TY - JOUR
T1 - The many meanings of aborto
T2 - pregnancy termination and the instability of a medical category over time
AU - O’Brien, Elizabeth
N1 - Funding Information:
Many thanks are due to Cassia Roth and Diana Paton for their support in conceptualizing this article, and for their thoughtful feedback at various stages throughout. Nora Jaffary was extremely generous in lending her expertise on the subject, and her comments and suggestions improved the work significantly. I also thank Matthew Butler, Ana María Carrillo Farga, Philippa Levine, and Gabriela Soto Laveaga for their guidance through various stages of this research and for their many contributions to the project. I am grateful for research funding from Mellon/ACLS, The National Science Foundation, the COMEXUS-Fulbright Program, and the University of Texas at Austin.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This article sheds light on an important facet of the history of abortion in Mexico: that is, moments in which doctors and priests reconciled the termination of pregnancy with religious ideologies, thus refracting the concept of abortion through a Catholic lens at different points in time. By underscoring ambivalences in the definition, implementation, and criminalization of abortive procedures, the research demonstrates that Mexican physicians periodically renamed or reconceptualized abortive procedures, thereby legitimizing them while constructing and reimagining the meaning of abortion itself. This allowed doctors to make fertility control compatible with religious ideologies and therefore legible to a range of spiritual and state authorities, but generally without overt challenges to Catholic claims about fetal life. The article argues that these historical cultures of Catholicized abortion—or, to use Morgan and Roberts’s term, ‘regime[s] of moral governance’—laid the historical groundwork for today’s chasm between practice and law.
AB - This article sheds light on an important facet of the history of abortion in Mexico: that is, moments in which doctors and priests reconciled the termination of pregnancy with religious ideologies, thus refracting the concept of abortion through a Catholic lens at different points in time. By underscoring ambivalences in the definition, implementation, and criminalization of abortive procedures, the research demonstrates that Mexican physicians periodically renamed or reconceptualized abortive procedures, thereby legitimizing them while constructing and reimagining the meaning of abortion itself. This allowed doctors to make fertility control compatible with religious ideologies and therefore legible to a range of spiritual and state authorities, but generally without overt challenges to Catholic claims about fetal life. The article argues that these historical cultures of Catholicized abortion—or, to use Morgan and Roberts’s term, ‘regime[s] of moral governance’—laid the historical groundwork for today’s chasm between practice and law.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094604203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094604203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09612025.2020.1833494
DO - 10.1080/09612025.2020.1833494
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094604203
SN - 0961-2025
VL - 30
SP - 952
EP - 970
JO - Women's History Review
JF - Women's History Review
IS - 6
ER -