The impact of multifocused interventions on sharps injury rates at an acute-care hospital

Robyn R.M. Gershon, Lisa Pearse, Martha Grimes, Patricia A. Flanagan, David Vlahov

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    50 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a multifocused interventional program on sharps injury rates. DESIGN: Sharps injury data were collected prospectively over a 9-year period (1990-1998). Pre- and postinterventional rates were compared after the implementation of sharps injury prevention interventions, which consisted of administrative, work-practice, and engineering controls (ie, the introduction of an anti-needlestick intravenous catheter and a new sharps disposal system). SETTING: Sharps injury data were collected from healthcare workers employed by a mid-sized, acute-care community hospital. RESULTS: Preinterventional annual sharps injury incidence rates decreased significantly from 82 sharps injuries/1,000 worked full-time-equivalent employees (WFTE) to 24 sharps injuries/1,000 WFTE employees postintervention (P<.0001), representing a 70% decline in incidence rate overall. Over the course of the study, the incidence rate for sharps injuries related to intravenous lines declined by 93%, hollow-bore needlesticks decreased by 75%, and non-hollow-bore injuries decreased by 25%. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a multifocused interventional program led to a significant and sustained decrease in the overall rate of sharps injuries in hospital-based healthcare workers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)806-811
    Number of pages6
    JournalInfection control and hospital epidemiology
    Volume20
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1999

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Epidemiology
    • Microbiology (medical)
    • Infectious Diseases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of multifocused interventions on sharps injury rates at an acute-care hospital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this