TY - JOUR
T1 - “The Heart of the Center”
T2 - Exploring the Role of the Patient Care Technician in US Dialysis Care
AU - Urbanski, Megan
AU - Blythe, Emma
AU - Hamblin, Alicia
AU - Bender, Alexis A.
AU - Hoge, Courtney
AU - Douglas-Ajayi, Clarica
AU - Rickenbach, Fran
AU - Joseph, Jessica
AU - Damron, Kelli Collins
AU - Morgan, Jennifer Craft
AU - Jaar, Bernard
AU - Plantinga, Laura
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Rationale & Objective: Dialysis patient care technicians (PCTs) provide essential, frontline care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. We qualitatively explored perceptions of the PCT job role, responsibilities, and training among current PCTs, non-PCT dialysis staff, and patients receiving hemodialysis. Study Design: Focus group study. Setting & Participants: Discussions were conducted in March–May 2023 among US PCTs, non-PCT staff, and patients. Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis was conducted using inductive and deductive strategies. Results: Seven focus groups (N = 36 participants) were conducted (3 with PCTs [n = 19], 2 with non-PCT staff [n = 6], and 2 with patients [n = 11]). Eight themes emerged: (1) value of PCT role is not reflected in job or organizational policies and structures; (2) PCTs play a flexible and often ill-defined role in dialysis clinics; (3) despite being in a position with high risk of burnout, PCTs find ways to persevere and provide high-quality care; (4) PCTs are often perceived as “helpers” or ancillary rather than an integral part of the dialysis care team; (5) PCT job training and qualifications are not standardized and often not commensurate with job expectations and responsibilities; (6) PCT-patient relationships are deeply valued, but boundaries can be fluid and become blurred because of the frequency and nature of dialysis care; (7) dialysis patients and staff are vulnerable to multilevel workplace safety issues; and (8) PCT-staff dynamics have a strong impact on employee morale, clinic efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Limitations: Non-English-speaking participants and physicians were excluded, limiting diversity in perspectives. Conclusions: PCTs play a multifaceted role in dialysis care that is highly valued among patients and staff but not always reflected in actual tasks performed by PCTs, training received by PCTs, or the respect afforded to PCTs. Our findings are actionable and can inform future intervention-based work aimed at improving the PCT role in US hemodialysis care. Plain-Language Summary: In the United States, patient care technicians (PCTs) spend the most chair-side time with patients receiving hemodialysis, but little is known about the role of patient care technicians (PCTs) in dialysis care. We conducted 7 focus groups with US PCTs, other dialysis staff, and patients receiving hemodialysis. Discussions showed that the PCT role is highly valued among dialysis staff and patients, but this is often poorly reflected in organizational structures. PCTs also often work outside of their scope and training. Additionally, PCTs and patients form strong bonds, but these relationships are sometimes viewed as problematic. Results highlight the complex, valuable role PCTs play in US dialysis care, as well as areas to improve to ultimately improve patient care.
AB - Rationale & Objective: Dialysis patient care technicians (PCTs) provide essential, frontline care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. We qualitatively explored perceptions of the PCT job role, responsibilities, and training among current PCTs, non-PCT dialysis staff, and patients receiving hemodialysis. Study Design: Focus group study. Setting & Participants: Discussions were conducted in March–May 2023 among US PCTs, non-PCT staff, and patients. Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis was conducted using inductive and deductive strategies. Results: Seven focus groups (N = 36 participants) were conducted (3 with PCTs [n = 19], 2 with non-PCT staff [n = 6], and 2 with patients [n = 11]). Eight themes emerged: (1) value of PCT role is not reflected in job or organizational policies and structures; (2) PCTs play a flexible and often ill-defined role in dialysis clinics; (3) despite being in a position with high risk of burnout, PCTs find ways to persevere and provide high-quality care; (4) PCTs are often perceived as “helpers” or ancillary rather than an integral part of the dialysis care team; (5) PCT job training and qualifications are not standardized and often not commensurate with job expectations and responsibilities; (6) PCT-patient relationships are deeply valued, but boundaries can be fluid and become blurred because of the frequency and nature of dialysis care; (7) dialysis patients and staff are vulnerable to multilevel workplace safety issues; and (8) PCT-staff dynamics have a strong impact on employee morale, clinic efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Limitations: Non-English-speaking participants and physicians were excluded, limiting diversity in perspectives. Conclusions: PCTs play a multifaceted role in dialysis care that is highly valued among patients and staff but not always reflected in actual tasks performed by PCTs, training received by PCTs, or the respect afforded to PCTs. Our findings are actionable and can inform future intervention-based work aimed at improving the PCT role in US hemodialysis care. Plain-Language Summary: In the United States, patient care technicians (PCTs) spend the most chair-side time with patients receiving hemodialysis, but little is known about the role of patient care technicians (PCTs) in dialysis care. We conducted 7 focus groups with US PCTs, other dialysis staff, and patients receiving hemodialysis. Discussions showed that the PCT role is highly valued among dialysis staff and patients, but this is often poorly reflected in organizational structures. PCTs also often work outside of their scope and training. Additionally, PCTs and patients form strong bonds, but these relationships are sometimes viewed as problematic. Results highlight the complex, valuable role PCTs play in US dialysis care, as well as areas to improve to ultimately improve patient care.
KW - Focus groups
KW - health care workers
KW - hemodialysis
KW - kidney failure
KW - patient care technician
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211253643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85211253643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100934
DO - 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100934
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85211253643
SN - 2590-0595
VL - 7
JO - Kidney Medicine
JF - Kidney Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 100934
ER -