TY - JOUR
T1 - The growth hormone response to pyridostigmine plus growth hormone releasing hormone is not influenced by pubertal maturation
AU - Cappa, M.
AU - Loche, S.
AU - Salvatori, R.
AU - Faedda, A.
AU - Borrelli, P.
AU - Cella, S. G.
AU - Pintor, C.
AU - Müller, E. E.
PY - 1991/1
Y1 - 1991/1
N2 - We have evaluated the effect of pubertal maturation on the GH response to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), pyridostigmine (PD), and the combined administration of PD + GHRH in a group of short normal children. Fifteen were prepubertal (13 boys and 2 girls, age 5.0–12.5 yr), 10 were early pubertal (8 boys and 2 girls, age 11.5–16.9 yr in Tanner stage 2–3 of pubertal maturation), and 6 were late pubertal (6 boys and 2 girls, age 13.6–17.1 yr in Tanner stage 4–5 of pubertal maturation). All subjects were tested on three occasions with GHRH 1–29 (1 μg/Kg iv), PD (60 mg po) and PD + GHRH (60 mg PD administered orally 60 min before GHRH). Peak GH levels after GHRH, PD, and PD + GHRH in the prepubertal children (16.0 ± 2.8, 8.1 ± 1.3 and 51.1 ± 5.5 ng/ml, mean ± SE, respectively) were not different from those observed in the early pubertal (18.4 ± 2.1, 9.1 ±1.9 and 41.2 ± 5.6 ng/ml, respectively) and in the late pubertal group (14.9 ± 2.3, 13.1 ± 2.4 and 42.6 ± 2.9 ng/ml, respectively). Evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC) also showed no difference in the GH response to GHRH, PD and PD + GHRH between the three groups studied. These results confirm that the combination PD + GHRH is a powerful test to study the GH secretory capacity of the pituitary, and show that pubertal maturation has no effect on the GH response to this test.
AB - We have evaluated the effect of pubertal maturation on the GH response to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), pyridostigmine (PD), and the combined administration of PD + GHRH in a group of short normal children. Fifteen were prepubertal (13 boys and 2 girls, age 5.0–12.5 yr), 10 were early pubertal (8 boys and 2 girls, age 11.5–16.9 yr in Tanner stage 2–3 of pubertal maturation), and 6 were late pubertal (6 boys and 2 girls, age 13.6–17.1 yr in Tanner stage 4–5 of pubertal maturation). All subjects were tested on three occasions with GHRH 1–29 (1 μg/Kg iv), PD (60 mg po) and PD + GHRH (60 mg PD administered orally 60 min before GHRH). Peak GH levels after GHRH, PD, and PD + GHRH in the prepubertal children (16.0 ± 2.8, 8.1 ± 1.3 and 51.1 ± 5.5 ng/ml, mean ± SE, respectively) were not different from those observed in the early pubertal (18.4 ± 2.1, 9.1 ±1.9 and 41.2 ± 5.6 ng/ml, respectively) and in the late pubertal group (14.9 ± 2.3, 13.1 ± 2.4 and 42.6 ± 2.9 ng/ml, respectively). Evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC) also showed no difference in the GH response to GHRH, PD and PD + GHRH between the three groups studied. These results confirm that the combination PD + GHRH is a powerful test to study the GH secretory capacity of the pituitary, and show that pubertal maturation has no effect on the GH response to this test.
KW - GH
KW - GHRH
KW - puberty
KW - pyridostigmine
KW - somatostatin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025977425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025977425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF03350258
DO - 10.1007/BF03350258
M3 - Article
C2 - 2045624
AN - SCOPUS:0025977425
SN - 0391-4097
VL - 14
SP - 41
EP - 45
JO - Journal of endocrinological investigation
JF - Journal of endocrinological investigation
IS - 1
ER -