TY - JOUR
T1 - The growing regulation of conversion therapy
AU - Drescher, Jack
AU - Schwartz, Alan
AU - Casoy, Flavio
AU - McIntosh, Christopher A.
AU - Hurley, Brian
AU - Ashley, Kenneth
AU - Barber, Mary
AU - Goldenberg, David
AU - Herbert, Sarah E.
AU - Lothwell, Lorraine E.
AU - Mattson, Marlin R.
AU - McAfee, Scot G.
AU - Pula, Jack
AU - Rosario, Vernon
AU - Tompkins, D. Andrew
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. "retreats or inpatient treatments" relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.
AB - Conversion therapies are any treatments, including individual talk therapy, behavioral (e.g. aversive stimuli), group therapy or milieu (e.g. "retreats or inpatient treatments" relying on all of the above methods) treatments, which attempt to change an individual's sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. However, these practices have been repudiated by major mental health organizations because of increasing evidence that they are ineffective and may cause harm to patients and their families who fail to change. At present, California, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Washington, D.C., and the Canadian Province of Ontario have passed legislation banning conversion therapy for minors and an increasing number of U.S. States are considering similar bans. In April 2015, the Obama administration also called for a ban on conversion therapies for minors. The growing trend toward banning conversion therapies creates challenges for licensing boards and ethics committees, most of which are unfamiliar with the issues raised by complaints against conversion therapists. This paper reviews the history of conversion therapy practices as well as clinical, ethical and research issues they raise. With this information, state licensing boards, ethics committees and other regulatory bodies will be better able to adjudicate complaints from members of the public who have been exposed to conversion therapies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994424513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994424513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994424513
SN - 1547-481X
VL - 102
SP - 7
EP - 12
JO - Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline
JF - Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline
IS - 2
ER -