TY - JOUR
T1 - The functions of nonsuicidal self-injury
T2 - Support for cognitive-affective regulation and opponent processes from a novel psychophysiological paradigm
AU - Franklin, Joseph C.
AU - Hessel, Elenda T.
AU - Aaron, Rachel V.
AU - Arthur, Michael S.
AU - Heilbron, Nicole
AU - Prinstein, Mitchell J.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Although research on the reasons for engaging in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has increased dramatically in the last few years, there are still many aspects of this pernicious behavior that are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to address these gaps in the literature, with a particular focus on investigating whether NSSI (a) regulates affective valence in addition to affective arousal and (b) serves a cognitive regulation function in addition to an affect regulation function. To elucidate these issues, the present study utilized a sample of 112 participants (33 controls, 39 no pain controls, 16 NSSI individuals, and 24 controls matching the affect dysregulation levels of the NSSI group), employed psychophysiological measures of affective valence (startle-alone reactivity) and quality of information processing (prepulse inhibition), and used experimental methods involving an NSSI-proxy to model the NSSI process. Results largely were consistent with predictions, supporting the hypotheses that NSSI serves to regulate cognitive processing and affective valence. On this latter point, however, the control groups also showed a decrease in negative affective valence after the NSSI-proxy. This unexpected finding is consistent with the hypothesis that opponent processes may contribute to the development of self-injurious behaviors (Joiner, 2005). Overall, the present study represents an important extension of previous laboratory NSSI studies and provides a fertile foundation for future studies aimed at understanding why people engage in NSSI.
AB - Although research on the reasons for engaging in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has increased dramatically in the last few years, there are still many aspects of this pernicious behavior that are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to address these gaps in the literature, with a particular focus on investigating whether NSSI (a) regulates affective valence in addition to affective arousal and (b) serves a cognitive regulation function in addition to an affect regulation function. To elucidate these issues, the present study utilized a sample of 112 participants (33 controls, 39 no pain controls, 16 NSSI individuals, and 24 controls matching the affect dysregulation levels of the NSSI group), employed psychophysiological measures of affective valence (startle-alone reactivity) and quality of information processing (prepulse inhibition), and used experimental methods involving an NSSI-proxy to model the NSSI process. Results largely were consistent with predictions, supporting the hypotheses that NSSI serves to regulate cognitive processing and affective valence. On this latter point, however, the control groups also showed a decrease in negative affective valence after the NSSI-proxy. This unexpected finding is consistent with the hypothesis that opponent processes may contribute to the development of self-injurious behaviors (Joiner, 2005). Overall, the present study represents an important extension of previous laboratory NSSI studies and provides a fertile foundation for future studies aimed at understanding why people engage in NSSI.
KW - Affect dysregulation
KW - NSSI
KW - Nonsuicidal self-injury
KW - PPI
KW - Prepulse inhibition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649718275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649718275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0020896
DO - 10.1037/a0020896
M3 - Article
C2 - 20939652
AN - SCOPUS:78649718275
SN - 0021-843X
VL - 119
SP - 850
EP - 862
JO - Journal of Abnormal Psychology
JF - Journal of Abnormal Psychology
IS - 4
ER -