The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center

Bonmyong Lee, Hansel J. Otero, Matthew T. Whitehead

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Background: The American College of Radiology (ACR) practice parameters for communication dictate that follow-up recommendations be suggested when appropriate. Radiologists assume that referring physicians read their reports and heed their advice. In reality, recommendations might not be carried out or even acknowledged. Objective: We aimed to determine the proportion of imaging recommendations that are acknowledged and acted upon. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive radiology reports containing “recommend” in the impression at a single academic children’s hospital over a 1-month period. We documented point of care (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient), study type, recommendation wording, and communication method (report only or direct verbal). We reviewed medical records to ascertain whether the recommendations were acknowledged or executed. We used chi-square tests to evaluate associations between variables. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: We reviewed 526 reports and excluded 73. We included the remaining 453 reports, from 370 unique patients (201 male, 169 female). Inpatients comprised most reports (n=223), followed by emergency department (ED) patients (n=118) and outpatients (n=112). Among these reports, 69% (n=313) of recommendations were executed. Of the 140 recommendations not carried out, 14% were acknowledged in clinical notes. Compliance correlated with point of care (ED>inpatient>outpatient; P=0.001) but not with additional verbal communication (P=0.33), study type (radiograph vs. other; P=0.35) or type of follow-up recommendation (follow-up imaging vs. other; P=0.99). Conclusion: Nearly one-third of radiology report follow-up recommendations are not executed. Recommendations are most commonly neglected for outpatient imaging reports. The radiology community should take steps to improve recommendation adherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1724-1729
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric radiology
Issue number13
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017


  • Children
  • Follow-up
  • Radiology
  • Recommendations
  • Reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this