The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives: findings from the field.

Holly A. Taylor, Peter J Pronovost, Ruth R. Faden, Nancy E. Kass, Jeremy Sugarman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Questions have been raised about whether and how health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives ought to be reviewed to address possible ethical issues associated with them. These questions have focused primarily on whether some QI initiatives meet the regulatory criteria for human subject research and should therefore be regulated and reviewed as such. Based on surveys of health care system professionals conducting QI initiatives and hospital CEOs, this issue brief finds that QI initiatives are routinely reviewed by a variety of internal mechanisms prior to implementation, although rarely through an institutional review board or another independent body charged specifically with ethical oversight of QI initiatives. Further research, the authors say, is needed to achieve a better understanding of how review mechanisms for QI initiatives are structured, including information on who reviews these activities, how they are reviewed, and whether such processes include an ethical assessment of the proposed QI initiative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalIssue brief (Commonwealth Fund)
Volume95
StatePublished - Aug 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives: findings from the field.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this