TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of patient-provider communication on 3-month recovery from acute low back pain
AU - Shaw, William S.
AU - Pransky, Glenn
AU - Roter, Debra L.
AU - Winters, Thomas
AU - Tveito, Torill H.
AU - Larson, Susan M.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Background: Patient-provider communication has been indicated as a key factor in early recovery from acute low back pain (LBP), one of the most common maladies seen in primary care; however, associations between communication and LBP outcomes have not been studied prospectively. Methods: Working adults (n = 97; 64% men; median age, 38 years) with acute LBP completed baseline surveys, agreed to audio recording of provider visits, and were followed for 3 months. Using the Roter Interaction Analysis System, 10 composite indices of communication were compared with 1- and 3-month patient outcomes. Results: Patients (n = 30) with significant pain and dysfunction persisting at 3 months provided more biomedical information (t[75], 2.61; P < .05) and engaged in more negative rapport building (t[75], 2.33; P < .05) but showed no increase in psychosocial/lifestyle communication during the initial visit (P > .05). Providers asked these patients more biomedical questions (r = 0.35 with dysfunction), more psychosocial/lifestyle questions (r = 0.30), made more efforts to engage the patient (t[75], 4.49; P < .05), and did more positive rapport building (t[75], 2.13; P < .05). Conclusions: Providers adapt their communication patterns to collect more information and establish greater rapport with high-risk patients, but patients focus more on biomedical than coping concerns. To better elicit psychosocial concerns from patients, providers may need to administer brief self-report measures or adopt more structured interviewing techniques.
AB - Background: Patient-provider communication has been indicated as a key factor in early recovery from acute low back pain (LBP), one of the most common maladies seen in primary care; however, associations between communication and LBP outcomes have not been studied prospectively. Methods: Working adults (n = 97; 64% men; median age, 38 years) with acute LBP completed baseline surveys, agreed to audio recording of provider visits, and were followed for 3 months. Using the Roter Interaction Analysis System, 10 composite indices of communication were compared with 1- and 3-month patient outcomes. Results: Patients (n = 30) with significant pain and dysfunction persisting at 3 months provided more biomedical information (t[75], 2.61; P < .05) and engaged in more negative rapport building (t[75], 2.33; P < .05) but showed no increase in psychosocial/lifestyle communication during the initial visit (P > .05). Providers asked these patients more biomedical questions (r = 0.35 with dysfunction), more psychosocial/lifestyle questions (r = 0.30), made more efforts to engage the patient (t[75], 4.49; P < .05), and did more positive rapport building (t[75], 2.13; P < .05). Conclusions: Providers adapt their communication patterns to collect more information and establish greater rapport with high-risk patients, but patients focus more on biomedical than coping concerns. To better elicit psychosocial concerns from patients, providers may need to administer brief self-report measures or adopt more structured interviewing techniques.
KW - Back pain
KW - Communication
KW - Patient-centered care
KW - Patient-provider communication
KW - Prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651376524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651376524&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100054
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100054
M3 - Article
C2 - 21209340
AN - SCOPUS:78651376524
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 24
SP - 16
EP - 25
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 1
ER -