The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The 1960 Nobel Prize was awarded to Macfarlane Burnet and Peter Medawar for immunological tolerance. The Nobel Archives reveal that the two were never nominated together by anyone; Burnet had repeatedly been nominated for his virology studies, and the Medawar group (including Rupert Billingham and Leslie Brent) had been nominated independently for their transplantation work. A review of the 1950s literature suggests that tolerance had not yet, by 1960, reached the level of acceptance and acclaim in the immunological community to appear to justify the award. Burnet probably should have received the Prize for his virus work, and perhaps also for his Clonal Selection Theory, whereas Billingham and Brent should have shared in a Prize with Medawar for transplantation. If a Prize were to be given for tolerance, most agree that Ray Owen should have shared in it, for his work on cattle chimerism. It is suggested that the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar for immunological tolerance may have been given for the wrong reasons and to the wrong associates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-274
Number of pages6
JournalImmunology
Volume147
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Burnet
  • Medawar
  • Nobel Prize
  • Tolerance
  • Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this