TY - JOUR
T1 - The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations
T2 - Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming
AU - Hillis, Argye E.
AU - Caramazza, Alfonso
N1 - Funding Information:
A version of this paper was presented at the Twelfth European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology in Bressanone, Italy, January 1994. The authors are grateful to Roz McCarthy, Andy Ellis, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. The research reported here was supported in part by NIH grant (NINCD) R01 19330 to Alfonso Caramazza.
PY - 1995/9/1
Y1 - 1995/9/1
N2 - We present evidence that semantic errors in object naming can arise not only from impairment to the semantic system but also from damage to input and output processes. Although each of these levels of disruption can result in similar types of semantic errors in object naming, they have different types of consequences for performance on other lexical tasks, such as comprehension and naming to definition. We show that the analysis of the co-occurrence of semantic errors in naming with different patterns of performance in other lexical processing tasks can be used to localise the source of semantic errors in the naming process. Finally, we argue that the similarity of semantic errors in object naming, resulting from damage to different components of the naming process, reflects the compositional nature of lexical semantic representations, and the processes by which they are activated by visual input, as well as the processes by which they activate output representations.
AB - We present evidence that semantic errors in object naming can arise not only from impairment to the semantic system but also from damage to input and output processes. Although each of these levels of disruption can result in similar types of semantic errors in object naming, they have different types of consequences for performance on other lexical tasks, such as comprehension and naming to definition. We show that the analysis of the co-occurrence of semantic errors in naming with different patterns of performance in other lexical processing tasks can be used to localise the source of semantic errors in the naming process. Finally, we argue that the similarity of semantic errors in object naming, resulting from damage to different components of the naming process, reflects the compositional nature of lexical semantic representations, and the processes by which they are activated by visual input, as well as the processes by which they activate output representations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029363924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029363924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09658219508253156
DO - 10.1080/09658219508253156
M3 - Article
C2 - 8574869
AN - SCOPUS:0029363924
SN - 0965-8211
VL - 3
SP - 333
EP - 358
JO - Memory
JF - Memory
IS - 3-4
ER -