The Changing Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Clinical Practice: An Updated Study

Lee M. Akst, Omar J. Haque, John O. Clarke, Alexander T. Hillel, Simon R.A. Best, Kenneth W. Altman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) database was utilized to understand evolving national trends in diagnosis and management of reflux. Methods: The NAMCS database was queried for visits related to gastroesophageal reflux diagnosis and management. Analysis performed for time periods 1998-2001, 2002-2005, and 2006-2009 was weighted to provide national estimates of care. Results were compared to previously reported time periods from 1990 to 2001 to evaluate patterns in overall visits, age and ethnicity of patients, provider type, and prescriptions provided. Results: The number of ambulatory visits for reflux increased from 8 684 000 in 1998-2001 to 15 750 000 in 2006-2009. Visits increased across each time period for internal medicine, family, and gastroenterology physicians. Among otolaryngologists, absolute visits increased from 1998-2001 to 2002-2005 but decreased in 2006-2009; difference between these time periods did not reach statistical significance. From 1998-2001 to 2006-2009, reflux medication use increased 233%, with continuing trends toward increased proton pump inhibitor use. Conclusions: Reflux visits have increased across all demographic subgroups studied. Knowledge of these trends may inform further paradigm shifts in diagnosis and management of reflux.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-235
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume126
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

  • NAMCS
  • gastroesophageal reflux
  • laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • reflux

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Changing Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Clinical Practice: An Updated Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this