TY - JOUR
T1 - Temperature-controlled power modulation compensates for heterogeneous nanoparticle distributions
T2 - a computational optimization analysis for magnetic hyperthermia
AU - Kandala, Sri Kamal
AU - Liapi, Eleni
AU - Whitcomb, Louis L.
AU - Attaluri, Anilchandra
AU - Ivkov, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based on work that was supported by the National Cancer Institute, under award numbers P30CA006973, 5R01CA194574; the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2014–70003-22358; and, by the Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Purpose: To study, with computational models, the utility of power modulation to reduce tissue temperature heterogeneity for variable nanoparticle distributions in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Methods: Tumour and surrounding tissue were modeled by elliptical two- and three-dimensional computational phantoms having six different nanoparticle distributions. Nanoparticles were modeled as point heat sources having amplitude-dependent loss power. The total number of nanoparticles was fixed, and their spatial distribution and heat output were varied. Heat transfer was computed by solving the Pennes’ bioheat equation using finite element methods (FEM) with temperature-dependent blood perfusion. Local temperature was regulated using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. Tissue temperature, thermal dose and tissue damage were calculated. The required minimum thermal dose delivered to the tumor was kept constant, and heating power was adjusted for comparison of both the heating methods. Results: Modulated power heating produced lower and more homogeneous temperature distributions than did constant power heating for all studied nanoparticle distributions. For a concentrated nanoparticle distribution, located off-center within the tumor, the maximum temperatures inside the tumor were 16% lower for modulated power heating when compared to constant power heating. This resulted in less damage to surrounding normal tissue. Modulated power heating reached target thermal doses up to nine-fold more rapidly when compared to constant power heating. Conclusions: Controlling the temperature at the tumor-healthy tissue boundary by modulating the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles demonstrably compensates for a variable nanoparticle distribution to deliver effective treatment.
AB - Purpose: To study, with computational models, the utility of power modulation to reduce tissue temperature heterogeneity for variable nanoparticle distributions in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia. Methods: Tumour and surrounding tissue were modeled by elliptical two- and three-dimensional computational phantoms having six different nanoparticle distributions. Nanoparticles were modeled as point heat sources having amplitude-dependent loss power. The total number of nanoparticles was fixed, and their spatial distribution and heat output were varied. Heat transfer was computed by solving the Pennes’ bioheat equation using finite element methods (FEM) with temperature-dependent blood perfusion. Local temperature was regulated using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. Tissue temperature, thermal dose and tissue damage were calculated. The required minimum thermal dose delivered to the tumor was kept constant, and heating power was adjusted for comparison of both the heating methods. Results: Modulated power heating produced lower and more homogeneous temperature distributions than did constant power heating for all studied nanoparticle distributions. For a concentrated nanoparticle distribution, located off-center within the tumor, the maximum temperatures inside the tumor were 16% lower for modulated power heating when compared to constant power heating. This resulted in less damage to surrounding normal tissue. Modulated power heating reached target thermal doses up to nine-fold more rapidly when compared to constant power heating. Conclusions: Controlling the temperature at the tumor-healthy tissue boundary by modulating the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles demonstrably compensates for a variable nanoparticle distribution to deliver effective treatment.
KW - Hyperthermia
KW - Pennes bioheat equation
KW - bioheat transfer
KW - magnetic nanoparticles
KW - perfusion modeling
KW - thermal dose
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058382326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058382326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02656736.2018.1538538
DO - 10.1080/02656736.2018.1538538
M3 - Article
C2 - 30541354
AN - SCOPUS:85058382326
SN - 0265-6736
VL - 36
SP - 115
EP - 129
JO - International Journal of Hyperthermia
JF - International Journal of Hyperthermia
IS - 1
ER -