Abstract
The study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of a task-sharing psychological treatment for perinatal depression using non-specialist community health workers. A double-blind individual randomised controlled trial was conducted in two antenatal clinics in the peri-urban settlement of Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Adult pregnant women who scored 13 or above on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression rating Scale (EPDS) were randomised into the intervention arm (structured six-session psychological treatment) or the control arm (routine antenatal health care and three monthly phone calls). The primary outcome was response on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at three months postpartum (minimum 40% score reduction from baseline) among participants who did not experience pregnancy or infant loss (modified intention-to-treat population) (registered on Clinical Trials: NCT01977326). Of 2187 eligible women approached, 425 (19.4%) screened positive on the EPDS and were randomised; 384 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (control: n = 200; intervention: n = 184). There were no significant differences in response on the HDRS at three months postpartum between the intervention and control arm. A task-sharing psychological treatment was not effective in treating depression among women living in Khayelitsha, South Africa. The findings give cause for reflection on the strategy of task-sharing in low-resource settings.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 103466 |
Journal | Behaviour Research and Therapy |
Volume | 130 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- Community health workers
- Counselling
- Perinatal depression
- Randomised controlled trial
- South Africa
- Task-sharing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Task-sharing of psychological treatment for antenatal depression in Khayelitsha, South Africa: Effects on antenatal and postnatal outcomes in an individual randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 130, 103466, 07.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Task-sharing of psychological treatment for antenatal depression in Khayelitsha, South Africa
T2 - Effects on antenatal and postnatal outcomes in an individual randomised controlled trial
AU - Lund, Crick
AU - Schneider, Marguerite
AU - Garman, Emily C.
AU - Davies, Thandi
AU - Munodawafa, Memory
AU - Honikman, Simone
AU - Bhana, Arvin
AU - Bass, Judith
AU - Bolton, Paul
AU - Dewey, Michael
AU - Joska, John
AU - Kagee, Ashraf
AU - Myer, Landon
AU - Petersen, Inge
AU - Prince, Martin
AU - Stein, Dan J.
AU - Tabana, Hanani
AU - Thornicroft, Graham
AU - Tomlinson, Mark
AU - Hanlon, Charlotte
AU - Alem, Atalay
AU - Susser, Ezra
N1 - Funding Information: This research was conducted as part of the Africa Focus on Intervention Research for Mental Health (AFFIRM). The NIMH DSMB contributed to the quality assurance and fidelity of the research, as well as protocol approval, ethical approval, and data collection recommendations. We are particularly grateful for the technical support of Pamela Collins, Adam Haim, LeShawndra Price and Beverly Pringle from the NIMH in the process of designing and implementing this study. We would like to thank Dan Chisholm for work in support of health economic aspects of the trial. We are grateful to Maia Lesosky for her review of the statistical analysis. We would like to thank the fieldworkers and counsellors for their dedication and hard work. We are grateful to the study participants for generously sharing their time and experiences during the conduct of this study. GT is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. GT acknowledges financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit awarded to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. GT is supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) Emerald project. GT also receives support from the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01MH100470 (Cobalt study). GT is also supported by the UK Medical Research Council in relation the Emilia and Indigo Partnership awards. MT is a Lead Investigator in the Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University Witwatersrand, South Africa. AA, CH, CL, IP, MP and GT are also funded through the ASSET research programme, supported by the UK's National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) using Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding (NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health Systems Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa at King's College London (16/136/54)). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care, England. CH receives support from AMARI as part of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [DEL-15-01].This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [Award Number U19MH095699]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Prof Stein is supported by the Medical Research Council of South Africa. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Funding Information: This research was conducted as part of the Africa Focus on Intervention Research for Mental Health (AFFIRM). The NIMH DSMB contributed to the quality assurance and fidelity of the research, as well as protocol approval, ethical approval, and data collection recommendations. We are particularly grateful for the technical support of Pamela Collins, Adam Haim, LeShawndra Price and Beverly Pringle from the NIMH in the process of designing and implementing this study. We would like to thank Dan Chisholm for work in support of health economic aspects of the trial. We are grateful to Maia Lesosky for her review of the statistical analysis. We would like to thank the fieldworkers and counsellors for their dedication and hard work. We are grateful to the study participants for generously sharing their time and experiences during the conduct of this study. GT is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. GT acknowledges financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit awarded to South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. GT is supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme ( FP7/2007–2013 ) Emerald project. GT also receives support from the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01MH100470 (Cobalt study). GT is also supported by the UK Medical Research Council in relation the Emilia and Indigo Partnership awards. MT is a Lead Investigator in the Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University Witwatersrand, South Africa. AA, CH, CL, IP, MP and GT are also funded through the ASSET research programme, supported by the UK's National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) using Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding (NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Health Systems Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa at King's College London (16/136/54)). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care, England. CH receives support from AMARI as part of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [DEL-15-01]. Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [Award Number U19MH095699 ]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Prof Stein is supported by the Medical Research Council of South Africa. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - The study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of a task-sharing psychological treatment for perinatal depression using non-specialist community health workers. A double-blind individual randomised controlled trial was conducted in two antenatal clinics in the peri-urban settlement of Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Adult pregnant women who scored 13 or above on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression rating Scale (EPDS) were randomised into the intervention arm (structured six-session psychological treatment) or the control arm (routine antenatal health care and three monthly phone calls). The primary outcome was response on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at three months postpartum (minimum 40% score reduction from baseline) among participants who did not experience pregnancy or infant loss (modified intention-to-treat population) (registered on Clinical Trials: NCT01977326). Of 2187 eligible women approached, 425 (19.4%) screened positive on the EPDS and were randomised; 384 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (control: n = 200; intervention: n = 184). There were no significant differences in response on the HDRS at three months postpartum between the intervention and control arm. A task-sharing psychological treatment was not effective in treating depression among women living in Khayelitsha, South Africa. The findings give cause for reflection on the strategy of task-sharing in low-resource settings.
AB - The study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of a task-sharing psychological treatment for perinatal depression using non-specialist community health workers. A double-blind individual randomised controlled trial was conducted in two antenatal clinics in the peri-urban settlement of Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Adult pregnant women who scored 13 or above on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression rating Scale (EPDS) were randomised into the intervention arm (structured six-session psychological treatment) or the control arm (routine antenatal health care and three monthly phone calls). The primary outcome was response on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at three months postpartum (minimum 40% score reduction from baseline) among participants who did not experience pregnancy or infant loss (modified intention-to-treat population) (registered on Clinical Trials: NCT01977326). Of 2187 eligible women approached, 425 (19.4%) screened positive on the EPDS and were randomised; 384 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (control: n = 200; intervention: n = 184). There were no significant differences in response on the HDRS at three months postpartum between the intervention and control arm. A task-sharing psychological treatment was not effective in treating depression among women living in Khayelitsha, South Africa. The findings give cause for reflection on the strategy of task-sharing in low-resource settings.
KW - Community health workers
KW - Counselling
KW - Perinatal depression
KW - Randomised controlled trial
KW - South Africa
KW - Task-sharing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075357294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075357294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103466
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103466
M3 - Article
C2 - 31733813
AN - SCOPUS:85075357294
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 130
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
M1 - 103466
ER -