TY - JOUR
T1 - Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging
AU - Prakash, P.
AU - Zbijewski, W.
AU - Gang, G. J.
AU - Ding, Y.
AU - Stayman, J. W.
AU - Yorkston, J.
AU - Carrino, J. A.
AU - Siewerdsen, J. H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge countless valuable conversations with Dr. Ian Cunningham (Robarts Research Institute, London ON) regarding cascaded systems analysis, Dr. Angel Pineda (UC Fullerton, Fullerton CA) regarding noise stationarity and Fourier metrology, Dr. John Boone (UC Davis, Davis CA) on CBCT system design and the power-law nature of anatomical clutter, Dr. Norbert Pelc (Stanford University, Palo Alto CA) on NPS analysis and measurement, and Dr. Iacovos Kyprianou (FDA, Rockville MD) on NPS analysis and x-ray scatter. The work was supported by NIH 2R01-CA-112163 and academic-industry partnership with Carestream Health Inc. (Rochester NY).
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - Purpose: This work applies a cascaded systems model for cone-beam CT imaging performance to the design and optimization of a system for musculoskeletal extremity imaging. The model provides a quantitative guide to the selection of system geometry, source and detector components, acquisition techniques, and reconstruction parameters. Methods: The model is based on cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise-power spectrum (NPS) and noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) combined with factors of system geometry (magnification, focal spot size, and scatter-to-primary ratio) and anatomical background clutter. The model was extended to task-based analysis of detectability index (d′) for tasks ranging in contrast and frequency content, and d′ was computed as a function of system magnification, detector pixel size, focal spot size, kVp, dose, electronic noise, voxel size, and reconstruction filter to examine trade-offs and optima among such factors in multivariate analysis. The model was tested quantitatively versus the measured NPS and qualitatively in cadaver images as a function of kVp, dose, pixel size, and reconstruction filter under conditions corresponding to the proposed scanner. Results: The analysis quantified trade-offs among factors of spatial resolution, noise, and dose. System magnification (M) was a critical design parameter with strong effect on spatial resolution, dose, and x-ray scatter, and a fairly robust optimum was identified at M ∼ 1.3 for the imaging tasks considered. The results suggested kVp selection in the range of ∼65-90 kVp, the lower end (65 kVp) maximizing subject contrast and the upper end maximizing NEQ (90 kVp). The analysis quantified fairly intuitive results-e.g., ∼0.1-0.2 mm pixel size (and a sharp reconstruction filter) optimal for high-frequency tasks (bone detail) compared to ∼0.4 mm pixel size (and a smooth reconstruction filter) for low-frequency (soft-tissue) tasks. This result suggests a specific protocol for 1 1 (full-resolution) projection data acquisition followed by full-resolution reconstruction with a sharp filter for high-frequency tasks along with 2 2 binning reconstruction with a smooth filter for low-frequency tasks. The analysis guided selection of specific source and detector components implemented on the proposed scanner. The analysis also quantified the potential benefits and points of diminishing return in focal spot size, reduced electronic noise, finer detector pixels, and low-dose limits of detectability. Theoretical results agreed quantitatively with the measured NPS and qualitatively with evaluation of cadaver images by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Conclusions: A fairly comprehensive model for 3D imaging performance in cone-beam CT combines factors of quantum noise, system geometry, anatomical background, and imaging task. The analysis provided a valuable, quantitative guide to design, optimization, and technique selection for a musculoskeletal extremities imaging system under development.
AB - Purpose: This work applies a cascaded systems model for cone-beam CT imaging performance to the design and optimization of a system for musculoskeletal extremity imaging. The model provides a quantitative guide to the selection of system geometry, source and detector components, acquisition techniques, and reconstruction parameters. Methods: The model is based on cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise-power spectrum (NPS) and noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) combined with factors of system geometry (magnification, focal spot size, and scatter-to-primary ratio) and anatomical background clutter. The model was extended to task-based analysis of detectability index (d′) for tasks ranging in contrast and frequency content, and d′ was computed as a function of system magnification, detector pixel size, focal spot size, kVp, dose, electronic noise, voxel size, and reconstruction filter to examine trade-offs and optima among such factors in multivariate analysis. The model was tested quantitatively versus the measured NPS and qualitatively in cadaver images as a function of kVp, dose, pixel size, and reconstruction filter under conditions corresponding to the proposed scanner. Results: The analysis quantified trade-offs among factors of spatial resolution, noise, and dose. System magnification (M) was a critical design parameter with strong effect on spatial resolution, dose, and x-ray scatter, and a fairly robust optimum was identified at M ∼ 1.3 for the imaging tasks considered. The results suggested kVp selection in the range of ∼65-90 kVp, the lower end (65 kVp) maximizing subject contrast and the upper end maximizing NEQ (90 kVp). The analysis quantified fairly intuitive results-e.g., ∼0.1-0.2 mm pixel size (and a sharp reconstruction filter) optimal for high-frequency tasks (bone detail) compared to ∼0.4 mm pixel size (and a smooth reconstruction filter) for low-frequency (soft-tissue) tasks. This result suggests a specific protocol for 1 1 (full-resolution) projection data acquisition followed by full-resolution reconstruction with a sharp filter for high-frequency tasks along with 2 2 binning reconstruction with a smooth filter for low-frequency tasks. The analysis guided selection of specific source and detector components implemented on the proposed scanner. The analysis also quantified the potential benefits and points of diminishing return in focal spot size, reduced electronic noise, finer detector pixels, and low-dose limits of detectability. Theoretical results agreed quantitatively with the measured NPS and qualitatively with evaluation of cadaver images by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Conclusions: A fairly comprehensive model for 3D imaging performance in cone-beam CT combines factors of quantum noise, system geometry, anatomical background, and imaging task. The analysis provided a valuable, quantitative guide to design, optimization, and technique selection for a musculoskeletal extremities imaging system under development.
KW - anatomical clutter
KW - cascaded systems analysis
KW - cone-beam computed tomography
KW - detectability index
KW - flat-panel detector
KW - imaging performance
KW - musculoskeletal radiology
KW - noise-equivalent quanta
KW - noise-power spectrum
KW - observer performance
KW - system optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053615327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053615327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1118/1.3633937
DO - 10.1118/1.3633937
M3 - Article
C2 - 21992379
AN - SCOPUS:80053615327
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 38
SP - 5612
EP - 5629
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
IS - 10
ER -