TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Transabdominal Cerclage Placed via Laparoscopy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth
AU - Moawad, Gaby N.
AU - Tyan, Paul
AU - Bracke, Tracey
AU - Abi Khalil, Elias D.
AU - Vargas, Vicky
AU - Gimovsky, Alexis
AU - Marfori, Cherie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Multiple interventions are available to minimize this occurrence; however, despite current recommendations including medical management, cervical length screening, and transvaginal cerclage, a substantial number of women still experience preterm birth. For those patients, experts recommend transabdominal cerclage (TAC). In this systematic review, we compared 26 studies (1116 patients) of TAC placed via laparotomy (TAC-lap) and 15 studies (728 patients) of TAC placed via laparoscopy (TAC-lsc). There was no significant difference in overall neonatal survival between the TAC-lsc and TAC-lap groups (89.9% vs 90.8%, respectively; p =.80). When T1 losses were excluded, the neonatal survival rate was significantly higher for the TAC-lsc group (96.5% vs 90.1%; p <.01). In terms of obstetrical outcomes, the TAC-lsc group had a higher rate of deliveries at gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks (82.9% vs 76%; p <.01) and a lower rate of deliveries at GA 23.0 to 33.6 weeks (6.8% vs 14.8%; p <.01). The TAC-lsc group also had fewer T2 losses (3.2% vs 7.8%; p <.01). TAC-lsc offers all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with better obstetrical outcomes compared with TAC-lap.
AB - Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Multiple interventions are available to minimize this occurrence; however, despite current recommendations including medical management, cervical length screening, and transvaginal cerclage, a substantial number of women still experience preterm birth. For those patients, experts recommend transabdominal cerclage (TAC). In this systematic review, we compared 26 studies (1116 patients) of TAC placed via laparotomy (TAC-lap) and 15 studies (728 patients) of TAC placed via laparoscopy (TAC-lsc). There was no significant difference in overall neonatal survival between the TAC-lsc and TAC-lap groups (89.9% vs 90.8%, respectively; p =.80). When T1 losses were excluded, the neonatal survival rate was significantly higher for the TAC-lsc group (96.5% vs 90.1%; p <.01). In terms of obstetrical outcomes, the TAC-lsc group had a higher rate of deliveries at gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks (82.9% vs 76%; p <.01) and a lower rate of deliveries at GA 23.0 to 33.6 weeks (6.8% vs 14.8%; p <.01). The TAC-lsc group also had fewer T2 losses (3.2% vs 7.8%; p <.01). TAC-lsc offers all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with better obstetrical outcomes compared with TAC-lap.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034432987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034432987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.021
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28797657
AN - SCOPUS:85034432987
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 25
SP - 277
EP - 286
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -