TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Systemic Therapies and Therapeutic Combinations with Local Treatments for High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
AU - Tosco, Lorenzo
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - D'amico, Antony Vincent
AU - Eastham, James
AU - Eisenberger, Mario
AU - Gleave, Martin
AU - Haustermans, Karin
AU - Logothetis, Christopher J.
AU - Saad, Fred
AU - Sweeney, Christopher
AU - Taplin, Mary Ellen
AU - Fizazi, Karim
N1 - Funding Information:
Treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is a field in evolution, with promising results for multimodal therapies next to EBRT or RP as primary therapies. The association of ADT with EBRT clearly improves results compared with EBRT alone. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding a survival benefit when ADT is associated with RP and further studies are needed to assess this point, especially with novel compounds. Phase 3 trials assessing docetaxel-based chemotherapy in men with high-risk prostate cancer are maturing, and data on clinical relapse-free survival, MFS, and OS are expected soon. Next-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are currently being tested in combination with primary treatment with promising preliminary results. Author contributions: Lorenzo Tosco had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design : All authors. Acquisition of data : Tosco. Analysis and interpretation of data : All authors. Drafting of the manuscript : All authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content : All authors. Statistical analysis : None. Obtaining funding : None. Administrative, technical, or material support: KU Leuven Libraries—2, Bergen—Learning Centre Désiré Collen. Supervision : Fizazi. Other : None. Financial disclosures: Lorenzo Tosco certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Lorenzo Tosco: research grants from Bayer, Ipsen, Ferring, and Janssen; consulting or advisory role in Ipsen; travel, accommodation, expenses from Astellas, Bayer, and Pierre-Fabre. Christopher Sweeney: receipt of grants/research supports from Janssen Biotech (Institute), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Sanofi, (Inst), Bayer (Inst), and Sotio (Inst); receipt of honoraria or consultation fees from Sanofi, Janssen Biotech, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Tolmar. Mary-Ellen Taplin: consulting honorarium from Janssen, Clovis, Incyte, and Astellas; research funding from Janssen, Pfizer, and Bayer. Funding/Support and role of the sponsor : None. Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Association of Urology
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Context: Systemic therapies, combined with local treatment for high-risk prostate cancer, are recommended by the international guidelines for specific subgroups of patients; however, for many of the clinical scenarios, it remains a research field. Objective: To perform a systematic review, and describe current evidence and perspectives about the multimodal treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic review of PubMED, Embase, Cochrane Library, European Society of Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual proceedings, and clinicalTrial.gov between January 2010 and February 2018 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. Evidence synthesis: Seventy-seven prospective trials were identified. According to multiple randomized trials, combining androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) outperforms EBRT alone for both relapse-free and overall survival. Neoadjuvant ADT did not show significant improvement compared with prostatectomy alone. The role of adjuvant ADT after prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease is still debated, with lack of data from phase 3 trials in pN0 patients. Novel androgen pathway inhibitors have been tested only in early-phase trials in addition to primary treatment. GETUG 12, RTOG 0521, and nonmetastatic subgroup of the STAMPEDE trial showed improved relapse-free survival for docetaxel in patients treated with EBRT plus ADT, although mature metastasis-free survival data are still pending. Both the SPCG-12 and the VACSP#553 trial showed no improvement in relapse-free survival for adjuvant docetaxel after prostatectomy. Conclusions: In contrast to the clearly demonstrated survival benefits of long-term adjuvant ADT when used with EBRT, its role after prostatectomy remains unclear especially in pN0 patients. Adding docetaxel to EBRT-ADT improves relapse-free survival, with immature results on overall survival. Novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are currently being tested in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Patient summary: Treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is based on a multimodality approach that includes systemic treatments. The best treatment or therapy combination remains to be defined. Androgen deprivation therapy improves overall survival when combined with radiotherapy, and such evidence is missing when the primary local treatment is radical prostatectomy. Docetaxel is associated with improved relapse-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer, but long-term follow-up is needed to assess its impact on survival. Bisphosphonates do not postpone the onset of bone metastases.
AB - Context: Systemic therapies, combined with local treatment for high-risk prostate cancer, are recommended by the international guidelines for specific subgroups of patients; however, for many of the clinical scenarios, it remains a research field. Objective: To perform a systematic review, and describe current evidence and perspectives about the multimodal treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic review of PubMED, Embase, Cochrane Library, European Society of Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual proceedings, and clinicalTrial.gov between January 2010 and February 2018 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. Evidence synthesis: Seventy-seven prospective trials were identified. According to multiple randomized trials, combining androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) outperforms EBRT alone for both relapse-free and overall survival. Neoadjuvant ADT did not show significant improvement compared with prostatectomy alone. The role of adjuvant ADT after prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease is still debated, with lack of data from phase 3 trials in pN0 patients. Novel androgen pathway inhibitors have been tested only in early-phase trials in addition to primary treatment. GETUG 12, RTOG 0521, and nonmetastatic subgroup of the STAMPEDE trial showed improved relapse-free survival for docetaxel in patients treated with EBRT plus ADT, although mature metastasis-free survival data are still pending. Both the SPCG-12 and the VACSP#553 trial showed no improvement in relapse-free survival for adjuvant docetaxel after prostatectomy. Conclusions: In contrast to the clearly demonstrated survival benefits of long-term adjuvant ADT when used with EBRT, its role after prostatectomy remains unclear especially in pN0 patients. Adding docetaxel to EBRT-ADT improves relapse-free survival, with immature results on overall survival. Novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors are currently being tested in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Patient summary: Treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is based on a multimodality approach that includes systemic treatments. The best treatment or therapy combination remains to be defined. Androgen deprivation therapy improves overall survival when combined with radiotherapy, and such evidence is missing when the primary local treatment is radical prostatectomy. Docetaxel is associated with improved relapse-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer, but long-term follow-up is needed to assess its impact on survival. Bisphosphonates do not postpone the onset of bone metastases.
KW - High risk
KW - Multimodality
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Systematic review
KW - Systemic therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052757186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052757186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.027
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.027
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30286948
AN - SCOPUS:85052757186
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 75
SP - 44
EP - 60
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 1
ER -