Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Johns Hopkins University Home
Search content at Johns Hopkins University
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening
Robert Hodgson
, Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner
, Susan C. Harvey
, Mary Edwards
, Javed Shaikh
, Mick Arber
, Julie Glanville
School of Medicine
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
38
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Breast Cancer Screening
100%
Full-field Digital Mammography
100%
3D Mammography
100%
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
66%
European Studies
25%
Cancer Detection Rate
25%
False Positive Rate
16%
Recall Rate
16%
Breast Cancer
8%
Systematic Literature Review
8%
Precancerous Lesions
8%
Cost Reduction
8%
Rate-based
8%
Relative Performance
8%
Diagnostic Test Accuracy
8%
Digital Mammography
8%
Prospero
8%
Arbitration
8%
Interval Cancer Rate
8%
Statistically Significant Difference
8%
Cochrane Handbook
8%
Medicine and Dentistry
Breast Cancer Screening
100%
Systematic Review
100%
Digital Mammography
100%
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
100%
Cancer Diagnosis
23%
False Positive Result
15%
Breast Cancer
7%
Health Care Cost
7%
Sensitivity and Specificity
7%
Malignant Neoplasm
7%
Diagnostic Accuracy
7%
Psychology
Breast Cancer
100%
Systematic Review
100%
United States of America
100%
False-Positive Rate
66%
Diagnostic Test
33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Systematic Review
100%
Malignant Neoplasm
100%
Cancer
100%
Distress
14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Breast Cancer Screening
100%
Digital Mammography
100%