TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthesized Mammography
T2 - The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
AU - Ambinder, Emily B.
AU - Harvey, Susan C.
AU - Panigrahi, Babita
AU - Li, Ximin
AU - Woods, Ryan W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Rationale and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the screening performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with synthesized mammography (SM) vs combined with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all screening studies utilizing FFDM + DBT (n = 7845) and SM + DBT (n = 14,776) between April 1, 2013, and February 15, 2016. Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value 1 (PPV1), positive predictive value 3 (PPV3), and cancer detection rate (CDR) were compared between the two groups. A generalized linear mixed model specifying the reading radiologist as the random effect and controlling for age was used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Results: The overall recall rate was significantly lower in the SM + DBT cohort compared to the FFDM + DBT cohort (7.06% vs 7.63%, P =.04). There was no difference in biopsy rate, PPV1, PPV3, or CDR between the two groups. Conclusions: When DBT is performed for screening, the use of SM rather than acquiring an additional FFDM has no significant effect on biopsy rate, PPV1, PPV3, or CDR. We found a decrease in recall rate in the SM + DBT group, which may be related to the learning curve of interpreting DBT. These findings support the use of SM for patients undergoing screening with DBT.
AB - Rationale and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the screening performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with synthesized mammography (SM) vs combined with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all screening studies utilizing FFDM + DBT (n = 7845) and SM + DBT (n = 14,776) between April 1, 2013, and February 15, 2016. Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value 1 (PPV1), positive predictive value 3 (PPV3), and cancer detection rate (CDR) were compared between the two groups. A generalized linear mixed model specifying the reading radiologist as the random effect and controlling for age was used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Results: The overall recall rate was significantly lower in the SM + DBT cohort compared to the FFDM + DBT cohort (7.06% vs 7.63%, P =.04). There was no difference in biopsy rate, PPV1, PPV3, or CDR between the two groups. Conclusions: When DBT is performed for screening, the use of SM rather than acquiring an additional FFDM has no significant effect on biopsy rate, PPV1, PPV3, or CDR. We found a decrease in recall rate in the SM + DBT group, which may be related to the learning curve of interpreting DBT. These findings support the use of SM for patients undergoing screening with DBT.
KW - Mammography
KW - breast neoplasms
KW - early detection of cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040924650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040924650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 29395801
AN - SCOPUS:85040924650
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 25
SP - 973
EP - 976
JO - Academic radiology
JF - Academic radiology
IS - 8
ER -